Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [ ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [ X ] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X]

The aggregate market value of the 9,992,863 shares of voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price ($1.00) at which the common equity was last sold as of the last business day of its most recently completed second fiscal quarter (June 27, 2014) was approximately $9,992,863.

At April 3, 2015, there were 26,234,368 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.



PART I
		Page
Item 1.	Business	3

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	7

Item 2.	Property	10

Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	10

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	10

PART II

Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	10

Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	13

Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation	13

Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk	15

Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	16

Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	30

Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	30

Item 9B.	Other Information	31

PART III

Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	32

Item 11.	Executive Compensation	33

Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	36

Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	37

Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	37


Item 15.	Exhibits, and Financial Statement Schedules	38

	Signatures	39

Insynergy Products Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on January 26, 2010. The Company was organized to engage in Direct Response marketing that has the ability to take a product from the drawing board to the ultimate consumer via sales through television, Internet and retail.

Certain matters discussed herein are forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-K involve risks and uncertainties, including statements as to:

These forward-looking statements can generally be identified as such because the context of the statement will include words such as we “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “estimate” or words of similar meaning. Similarly, statements that describe our future plans, objectives or goals are also forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties which are described in close proximity to such statements and which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. Shareholders, potential investors and other readers are urged to consider these factors in evaluating the forward-looking statements and are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements included herein are only made as of the date of this Form 10-K, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update such forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.

The Company’s management believes the Direct Response market to be a booming business that has evolved during the past two decades from an entrepreneurial industry to one that now encompasses the marketing efforts of a vast number of companies to produce sales of a myriad of products. According to the Electronic Retailing Association (www.retailing.org), the only trade association that represents larger companies in the direct-to-consumer marketplace, this is an estimated more than $300 billion market. Management believes, but cannot assure, that this is a reasonable assessment of the size of this market.

Direct Response Marketing generally takes the form of the marketing and sale of products utilizing infomercials which are broadcast over local television channels, paired with a Call Response Center which takes the calls generated by potential purchasers who call in after viewing the infomercial, and a fulfillment center, which ships out the product.

The infomercial is designed to solicit a direct response in the target audience which is specific and quantifiable. The delivery of the response is directly between the viewer and the advertiser, that is, the customer responds to the marketer or its agent directly. In direct marketing (such as telemarketing), there is no intermediary broadcast media involved. In Direct “Response” Marketing, marketers use broadcast media to encourage customers to contact them directly. This direct response marketing seeks to elicit action. Marketing results from a Direct Response Marketing Program can be tracked, measured, and quantified.

Sufficient information for the consumer to make a decision whether to act and buy

Provision of a means for buy response (typically multiple options such as toll free number, web page, and email)

Direct Response Marketing is often used for new and innovative products that can be demonstrated and shown to make life easier or better, or products which solve a specific problem the target audience may have.

Health and fitness products, skin, hair and personal care products, nutritional supplements, house wares and appliances, have all been successfully marketed. Anti-aging products are a category of product which is currently generating successful sales. An idea for a new product usually comes from an inventor, who then approaches a company such as ours for development and implementation of a Direct Marketing Program or campaign for the product.

Our Company selects products invented by others for use in a Direct Response Marketing Program, but we also develop our own products for sale as well. We will analyze each product presented to us to see if it looks like it would be an attractive candidate for a direct marketing campaign. We will look for products which satisfy a specific need that can be concretely presented in the infomercial, lend themselves to generation of a call for action motivation in the target audience, provide for a substantial markup on the sales price over their cost (typically somewhere in the realm of a 5 to 1 markup), have a lower range target price in order to encourage immediate discretionary purchase, and have anticipated staying power as a useful product which the Company can sell over and over again.

We will license products from the inventor or owner of the product, with license fees paid on collected revenue from the sales of the product, net of returns and allowances. Typical license fees run between 2% and 4% of net sales for sales generated over television and the web, and if the Company is able to then take the product for distribution to traditional brick and mortar outlets for further sales, an increased license fee of between 4% and 6% is typically paid. The license rights typically run for between 24 and 36 months, and are generally renewable. Products may or may not have patent protection, copyright protection, and/or trademark protection.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company centered its efforts on four products; the Plumber’s Hero, a product that clears normal clogs in the home, a fitness product, a hair straightening product and a golf training aid for putting.

Our exclusive License Agreement gives us worldwide rights to advertise, promote, market, manufacture, distribute, sell and/or exploit the product in any and all media, means and markets and all channels of trade and distribution now known or hereafter devised.

The Plumber’s Hero kit comes with a canister containing twenty applications of the Plumber’s Hero formula, one large and one small rubber drain cover to work on kitchen sinks, including double sinks with a disposal, bathroom, shower and tub drains, as well as an extension handle for use in the toilet.

Two minute, one minute and thirty second commercials have been shot and the marketing campaign began the later part of 2014 and is currently still running. Also during the later part of 2014 and the beginning of 2015, the Plumber’s Hero product and commercial was shown to all the major domestic retailers and was met very favorably. The Company has already been approved to become a vendor with most of the major retailers and in the first quarter of 2015 has begun shipping product and generating revenue. This should continue throughout 2015 and beyond.

Our patented fitness product was invented by a renown medical doctor who developed the product for physical therapy after undergoing back surgery and feeling he could develop a better protocol for recovery. Many elements of a thirty minute infomercial have already been shot and the show should be completed before mid-year and marketing begin shortly thereafter.

The hair straightening product, which is a natural product that does not contain formaldehyde, can be applied at home and should keep hair straight two to three months on average. This will be a thirty minute infomercial, some of which has already been shot. The Company looks to market this product the second half of 2015.

The fourth product scheduled to be available in 2015 is a golf training aid for improving ones putting and was developed by a former winner on the Champions Tour. Prototypes of the product have been shown to some current touring professionals and been met by a very positive response.

Demonstrating the appeal and uniqueness of the product in a sales video infomercial is critical in creating a buying response. An offer must be presented in the video such that its appeal is relevant to the wants or needs of the audience.

Short form direct response video commercials have time lengths ranging from 30 seconds to 2 minutes. Long form infomercials are 30 minutes in length. Direct Response ads can be contrasted with normal television commercials because traditional commercials normally do not solicit a direct immediate response from the viewer, but instead try to brand their product in the market place.

The typical direct response spot of two minutes consists of a spokesperson or dominant voice over footage showing the product being demonstrated, solving a problem and/or making life easier and better. An 800 phone number will be shown on screen a few seconds into the spot along with a website address. The last few seconds of the spot will show a blue screen with all the information to make a purchase and provide a call to action.

The Company will write, produce, hire the talent, direct, shoot and edit many of its infomercials in-house. The Company will also hire outside production companies who have had success shooting shows with products in the same genre as the products we will be releasing such as fitness, house wares and hair care.

We test all our products with a retail sales group before we execute a license agreement, in order to gauge the likely reaction in the market place. Once a license agreement is executed, we will typically create the video, and then spend small amounts of money on media air time over test stations and test air segments that have what management considers the right demographics for a particular product. If a product successfully generates sales in these test spots, we will then expand the campaign for the product over additional TV markets. During the test marketing stage we also tweak the video infomercial as to dialogue, and as to order of presentment of material.

The products and demographics will dictate which TV market management selects for a particular campaign. We expect most of our spots to run approximately 2 minutes. The cost per spot will depend on which market it is show in, and at what time the spot airs. We may also use radio and/or direct mailing campaigns, and will provide a website over which a product can be purchased.

Once a customer has decided to buy our product, they either call an 800 phone number or go to a website to conclude the purchase. In today’s marketing climate, order taking for many products sold under $20 is done by an interactive voice recognition telephone application (“IVR”) which electronically takes the customer’s name and address, phone number, credit card information and orders for products. Order information will be in a file format to be batched and sent daily to a fulfillment facility.

Using the IVR application is perhaps half the cost of using live agents to respond to calls, but for some products with higher price points, live sales agents provided by independent third party contractors will be used.

The Company will subcontract out to independent third parties the telephone marketing functions associated with a campaign for each product. Initially, the Company has contracted for Teleperformance (“Teleperformance”) to provide this function, although many other companies are available to undertake this roll at competitive pricing, and the Company may use others in the future.

Based on our contract with Teleperformance, inbound calls are billed at $0.15 per connect minute with a $0.35 per order processing fee for all phone orders. There is also a set-up and development fee of $750 for the IVR application and a one-time programming, training and set-up fee of $1,000 for live operator services.

The Company will out-source the manufacture of products it markets to independent third party companies. The Company has had discussions with several mainland China manufacturers, for the manufacture of products. Unless presented with a Letter of Credit, a mainland China manufacturer generally requires 30% as down payment to begin manufacturing and the balance when the product is ready to ship. Management believes there are many sources for manufacturing in China, and elsewhere offshore, which are generally dependable and reasonably priced. However, the product, Plumber’s Hero, is 100% manufactured in the United States.

Fulfillment involves the storage of inventory, acceptance of order information, boxing and shipping out of products, and dealing with questions, order status, complaints, returns and allowances on products, and maintaining proper records. The fulfillment function on each product will be sub-contracted out to independent third party companies.

Initially, the Company has contracted for Moulton Logistics to provide this function, although many other companies are available to undertake this role at competitive prices, and the Company may use others in the future.

Moulton Logistics is headquartered in Van Nuys, California, close to the Los Angeles and Long Beach ports and is also close to the Company’s offices. They specialize in order taking and fulfillment for Direct Marketing Response Products. Moulton Logistics can provide a full range of fulfillment services including a full call center, full service direct mail, real-time online inventory reports, database management, continuity programs, Electronic Data Interchange for retail fulfillment and drop shipping, among others.

The Company’s contract with Moulton Logistics provides for a Data Base/Order Processing/Maintenance Fee on each customer transaction, a per transaction fee on credit card and e-check transactions, and a per transaction fee plus separate SKU fees and per cubic foot fees for packaging and shipping.

Sales orders for Direct Response Marketing Programs are typically taken using credit cards. The Company has contracted for credit card processing of sales orders on products with BluePay, an independent third party company. BluePay powers payment processing for companies that sell direct to consumers through internet retail, online services, direct response marketing and multichannel retail.

Some of our future Direct Response Marketing Campaigns will no doubt fail. Direct response products can fail due to many reasons, including no perceived need for the product, other competing products provide better solutions or are better priced, the product price is too high, the infomercial is unconvincing, the wrong time slot or market segment is selected for broadcast, the marketing company lacks sufficient capital to fund product inventory and air time purchase, and for a variety of other reasons. Larger trends, such as a recessionary economy, less discretionary purchasing power in the hands of consumers, more restrictive credit or higher rates on credit cards, also can discourage sales and cause a campaign to fail. Other issues can also cause a campaign to fail, such as too low a price markup, poor quality resulting in high returns, a lack of sufficient capital to purchase sufficient airtime, or to purchase sufficient inventory, or failure by third party contractors to properly carry out their responsibilities for manufacturer, order taking, and fulfillment.

Management will endeavor to avoid these pitfalls in selection of a product, production of the TV spot, test marketing, purchasing of air time, and other aspects of running of the campaign, but there are significant risks in conducting a direct response marketing business, and we will no doubt have some product failures which will result in loss, while other products may barely breakeven and return the costs laid out to undertake product production and the campaign.

If a product is financially successful in our direct marketing response campaign, management will consider marketing and distributing the product to big box retail stores, building off the product branding that has occurred by running the television campaign.

There is significant competition in the Direct Response Marketing industry from both small and large companies since there are really no barriers to entry. As a result, there are literally hundreds of direct response companies that operate in the U.S. and offer a wide variety of products across all categories of consumer goods.

The Company will have to rely on the skills of its management to pick products which produce successful direct response marketing campaigns and ultimately profits to the Company.

The Company carries general liability insurance through CNA with an occurrence limit of $1,000,000 with a general aggregate of $2,000,000 and a deductible of $500. Studio City Plaza Title Holding Co. LLC, the Company’s landlord, is listed as an Additional Insured.

The Company also carries product liability insurance to insure against liability on the products it sells.

The Company may file registrations for such patents, trademarks, or copyrights, as it deems commercially prudent from time to time. The name “Plumber’s Hero” is trademarked.

Our infomercials may be subject to regulation by the FTC and each of the states under general consumer protection statutes prohibiting unfair or deceptive acts and practices. Most deception involves written or oral misrepresentations, or omissions of material information. Deception may also occur in other forms of conduct associated with a sales transaction.

The Company has three full-time employees, but will use independent contractors when we shoot our direct response marketing TV spots.

We qualify as an “emerging growth company” under the recently enacted Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”). As a result, we are permitted to, and intend to, rely on exemptions from certain disclosure requirements. For so long as we are an emerging growth company, among other things, we will not be required to:

Have an auditor report on our internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act;

Submit certain executive compensation matters to shareholder advisory votes, such as “say-on-pay” and “say-on-frequency”

Obtain shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved; and

Disclose certain executive compensation related items such as the correlation between executive compensation and performance and comparisons of the Chief Executives compensation to median employee compensation.

In addition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act also provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. In other words, an emerging growth company can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected to take advantage of the benefits of this extended transition period. Our financial statements may therefore not be comparable to those of companies that comply with such new or revised accounting standards.

We will remain an “emerging growth company” for up to five years, or until the earliest of (i) the last day of the first fiscal year in which our total annual gross revenues exceed $1 billion; (ii) the date that we become a “large accelerated filer” as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which would occur if the market value of our ordinary shares that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter or (iii) the date on which we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt during the preceding three-year period.

Shares of our common stock are highly speculative in nature, involve a high degree of risk and should be purchased only by persons who can afford to lose the entire amount invested in the common stock. Before purchasing any of the shares of common stock, you should carefully consider the following factors relating to our business and prospects. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition or operating results could be materially adversely affected. In such case, the trading price of our common stock could decline and you may lose all or part of your investment.

We are dependent upon external financing to fund our ongoing operations and implement our business plan.

Currently, we are dependent upon external financing to fund our operations. We project that the Company will need over the next 12 months approximately $1,000,000 in “additional working capital” to meet short term liquidity requirements. By the end of the first quarter 2015, we expect to have an accounts receivable in excess of $1,000,000. It is imperative that we obtain additional financing to finance ongoing operations. We currently do not have commitments from third parties for additional capital. We cannot be certain that any such financing will be available or available on commercially reasonable terms.

Failure to secure additional financing in a timely manner and on favorable terms would have a material adverse effect on our financial performance, results of operations and stock price and require us to curtail or cease operations, sell off our assets, and/or perhaps seek protection from our creditors through bankruptcy proceedings.

Furthermore, additional equity financing, if obtained, may be dilutive to the holders of our common stock, and debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants, and strategic relationships, which may require that we relinquish valuable rights.

No assurance the Company will be successful and ultimately operate profitably.

The Company is currently operating at a loss, and there is no assurance that the plans and strategies of the Company will be successful, or that the Company will be able to operate profitably. If we cannot operate profitably, you could lose your entire investment. We may not generate sufficient revenues in the next twelve months to become profitable and therefore will have to rely solely on the cash we raise from the private sale of debt or equity securities. Our ability to privately sell our securities is uncertain, as are the future terms upon which they might be sold.

The products we select for direct response marketing may not receive favorable market response, or the product campaign may fair for other reasons.

Some of our future Direct Response Marketing Campaigns will no doubt fail. Direct Response Marketing products can fail due to many reasons, including no perceived need for the product, other competing products provide better solutions or are better priced, the product price is too high, the infomercial is unconvincing, the wrong time slot or market segment is selected for broadcast, and for a variety of other reasons. Larger trends, such as a recessionary economy, less discretionary purchasing power in the hands of consumers, more restrictive credit and higher rates on credit cards, also can discourage sales and cause a campaign to fail. Operational issues can also cause a campaign to fail, such as too low a price markup, poor quality resulting in high returns; a lack of sufficient capital to purchase sufficient inventory, or failure by subcontractors to properly carry out their responsibilities for manufacturer, order taking, and fulfillment.

Lack of market acceptance for a product is a particularly significant risk in our business. We will no doubt have some failures which will result in loss, and some products will likely only break even, doing little more then return the costs expended to undertake product production and to pay for the campaign itself. It is up to management to select, test, and carefully place infomercials for those Products which in management’s opinion have a good chance of being successful and generating significant revenues and profits in the Market place. There is no assurance that management will be successful in these efforts to the required degree so that the Company becomes profitable.

With no significant operating history it is difficult to evaluate our Company.

The Company was deemed to have exited the development stage at December 31, 2012 as it had begun planned principle operations. Our business and prospects are difficult to evaluate because we have minimal operating history. An investment in us should be considered a high-risk investment where you could lose your entire investment.

We face intense competition from competitors with more experience, long track records, larger staffs, and better funding.

We will face intense competition in our industry from other established Companies once we begin product campaigns. We will compete to obtain licenses for products, for air time, and for the attention of the consumer and the consumer’s discretionary dollar spent in this market. Many of our competitors have significantly greater financial, technological, marketing and distribution resources than we do. Their greater capabilities in these areas enable them to better withstand periodic product campaign failures, and more general downturns in the industry, compete more effectively on the basis of price and production and more quickly develop or locate and license new products. In addition, new companies may enter the markets in which we expect to compete, further increasing competition in our industry.

We carry product liability insurance in such amounts as management deems appropriate, but there is no assurance that such insurance will be sufficient to cover claims if one of our products does not perform as described and causes damage. The Company could in the future become liable for substantial claims which in the aggregate materially exceed the limits of the Company product liability insurance, with that result that the Company suffers substantial losses, with a resulting loss in value of our stock.

We could fail to retain one or both of our two principle officers, which could be detrimental to our operations.

Our success largely depends on the efforts and abilities of our Chief Executive Officer, Sanford Lang, and our Chief Operating Officer, Martin Goldrod. We have employment agreements with Messrs Lang and Goldrod, but we do not carry key man insurance on their lives. The loss of either ones’ services could materially harm our business because of the cost and time necessary to find a successor.

Our two principle executive officers in the aggregate own 36.2% of our outstanding common stock and control the Company.

Our two principle executive officers, Sanford Lang and Martin Goldrod, in the aggregate own or control 36.2% of our outstanding common stock. As a result of this control, they effectively control the election of a majority of our Board of Directors, and have the ability to unilaterally block mergers, acquisitions and/or other corporate transactions which require the consent of a majority in capital interest of our shareholders.

Trading of our stock may be restricted by the Securities Exchange Commission’s penny stock regulations, which may limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.

The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted regulations which generally define “penny stock” to be any equity security that has a market price (as defined) less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. Our securities are covered by the penny stock rules, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell to persons other than established customers and “accredited investors”. The term “accredited investor” refers generally to institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with a net worth exclusive of home in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouse. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document in a form prepared by the Securities and Exchange Commission, which provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer’s confirmation. In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from these rules, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for the stock that is subject to these penny stock rules. Consequently, these penny stock rules may affect the ability of broker-dealers to trade our securities. We believe that the penny stock rules discourage investor interest in and limit the marketability of our common stock.

As a public company, we are required to meet periodic reporting requirements under SEC rules and regulations. Complying with federal securities laws as a public company is expensive and we will incur significant time and expense enhancing, documenting, testing and certifying our internal control over financial reporting.

We are required to file periodic reports containing our financial statements within a specified time following the completion of each quarterly and annual period, which comply with SEC rules and regulations, including audited financial statements. We may experience difficulty in meeting these SEC's reporting requirements. Any failure by us to file compliant periodic reports with the SEC in a timely manner could harm our reputation and reduce the trading price of our common stock.

As a public company we will incur significant legal, accounting, insurance and other expenses. Compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and with other SEC and Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) rules will increase our legal and financial compliance costs and make some activities more time-consuming and costly. We cannot predict or estimate with precision the amount of additional costs we may incur or the timing of such costs.

Currently, we are an emerging growth company, and, therefore, do not have to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for up to five years. Beginning with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2013, if we are no longer considered an emerging growth company, our independent registered public accounting firm will be required to comply with these Section 404 requirements. This process generally requires significant documentation of policies, procedures and systems, review of that documentation by our internal accounting staff and our outside auditors and testing of our internal control over financial reporting by our internal accounting staff and our outside independent registered public accounting firm. Documentation and testing of our internal controls would involve considerable time and expense, and could strain our internal resources and have an adverse impact on our operating costs, and may make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors or as executive officers.

Our principal offices are located at 4705 Laurel Canyon Blvd., Suite 205, Studio City, California, 91607. The property is leased from Studio City Plaza Title Holding Co. LLC, an unaffiliated third party, on a long term lease basis with 14 remaining months to run. The monthly lease payments are approximately $6,500. The Company considers the space to be adequate for the next several years.

Item 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Our common stock is listed to trade on the OTCMarkets Pink under the symbol “ISYG.” The following table presents the range of the high and low trading prices of our common stock for each quarter of the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 as reported by the OTCMarkets. Bid and ask quotations are available when there are two or more market makers and those quotations represent prices between dealers and may not include retail markups, markdowns, or commissions and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

Our shares are subject to Section 15(g) and Rule 15g-9 of the Securities and Exchange Act, commonly referred to as the “penny stock” rule. The rule defines penny stock to be any equity security that has a market price less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. These rules may restrict the ability of broker-dealers to trade or maintain a market in our common stock and may affect the ability of shareholders to sell their shares. Broker-dealers who sell penny stocks to persons other than established customers and accredited investors must make a special suitability determination for the purchase of the security. Accredited investors, in general, include individuals with assets in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 together with their spouse, and certain institutional investors. The rules require the broker-dealer to receive the purchaser’s written consent to the transaction prior to the purchase and require the broker-dealer to deliver a risk disclosure document relating to the penny stock prior to the first transaction. A broker-dealer also must disclose the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, and current quotations for the security. Finally, monthly statements must be sent to customers disclosing recent price information for the penny stocks.

As of April 3, 2015, we had 162 shareholders of record, which does not include shareholders who hold shares in “street accounts” of securities brokers.

We have not paid cash or stock dividends and have no present plan to pay any dividends, intending instead to reinvest our earnings, if any. For the foreseeable future, we expect to retain any earnings to finance the operation and expansion of our business and the payment of any cash dividends on our common stock is unlikely.

On January 29, 2014, the Company issued options to purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock to Full Service Marketing for services. The options have an exercise price of $0.27, are exercisable immediately and expire January 29, 2017. These options were privately issued in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

On May 9, 2014, the Company issued 62,500 shares of common stock for services to Full Service Marketing. The shares were valued at $0.26 per share for a total non-cash expense of $16,313. Fair market value for the shares was determined by taking the average share price for each cash-for-stock purchase in the period. All shares were privately issued with a restrictive legend, in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

On June 16, 2014, the Company converted principal and interest due to a creditor, totaling $181,359 into 850,000 shares of common stock. The shares were valued at $0.285 which was determined using the average of the most recent stock sales for cash. All shares were privately issued with a restrictive legend, in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

On July 1, 2014, the Company issued 1,111,617 shares of common stock for services to Namfrod Enterprises. The shares were valued at $0.35 per share for a total non-cash expense of $389,066. All shares were privately issued with a restrictive legend, in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

On August 29, 2014, the Company cancelled 380,000 shares of common stock, that had been issued in a prior period for services, for non-performance of the agreed upon services.

On September 10, 2014, the Company sold 135,140 shares of common stock to an investor, for cash proceeds of $50,000. Proceeds were used to fund general operating activities. All shares were privately issued with a restrictive legend, in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

On September 15, 2014, the Company sold 75,758 shares of common stock to an investor, for cash proceeds of $25,000. Proceeds were used to fund general operating activities. All shares were privately issued with a restrictive legend, in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

On October 8, 2014, the Company converted principal and interest due to a creditor, totaling $162,988 into 980,000 shares of common stock, valued at $0.317 per share. All shares were privately issued with a restrictive legend, in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

On October 15, 2014, the Company sold 10,000 shares of common stock to an investor, for cash proceeds of $3,000. All shares were privately issued with a restrictive legend, in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

On October 15, 2014, the Company issued 37,000 shares of common stock for services to iCore Health. The shares were valued at $0.32 per share for a total non-cash expense of $11,729. All shares were privately issued with a restrictive legend, in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

On October 21, 2014, the Company converted principal and interest due to a creditor, totaling $69,079 into 363,158 shares of common stock, valued at $0.317 per share. All shares were privately issued with a restrictive legend, in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

On October 30, 2014, the Company sold 37,037 shares of common stock to an investor for cash proceeds of $10,000. All shares were privately issued with a restrictive legend, in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

On November 18, 2014, the Company converted principal and interest due to a creditor, totaling $36,024 into 337,000 shares of common stock, valued at $0.317 per share. All shares were privately issued with a restrictive legend, in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

On December 17, 2014, the Company converted principal and interest due to a creditor, totaling $27,054 into 150,000 shares of common stock, valued at $0.317 per share. All shares were privately issued with a restrictive legend, in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

November 18, 2014, the Company converted principal and interest due to a creditor, totaling $121,965 into 540,000 shares of common stock valued at $0.317 per share. All shares were privately issued with a restrictive legend, in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

On December 17, 2014, the Company converted principal and interest due to a creditor, totaling $100,000 into 400,000 shares of common stock valued at $0.317 per share. All shares were privately issued with a restrictive legend, in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

December 17, 2014, the Company converted principal and interest due to a creditor, totaling $26,230 into 104,920 shares of common stock valued at $0.317 per share. All shares were privately issued with a restrictive legend, in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

The Company did not repurchase any of its securities during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.

The registrant is a smaller reporting company, pursuant to Rule 229.10(f)(1), and is not required to report this information.

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The year ended December 31, 2014 was a year of great progress for the Company. Most importantly, our product, the Plumber’s Hero, was accepted by both the direct consumer and also retail. We were invited to become a vendor with several of the major domestic retailers with the understanding that upon completion of the application process, we would begin to receive purchase orders for the Plumber’s Hero. As of the end of the first quarter of 2015, the Plumber’s Hero is available in eight major retailers throughout the United States.

The Plumber’s Hero kit comes with a canister containing twenty applications of the Plumber’s Hero formula, a large and a small rubber drain cover to work on kitchen sinks including double sinks with a disposal, bathroom, shower and tub drains as well as an extension handle for use in the toilet.

Two minute, one minute and thirty second commercials have been shot and the marketing campaign began the later part of 2014 and is currently still running. Also during the later part of 2014 and the beginning of 2015, the Plumber’s Hero product and commercial was shown to all the major domestic retailers and was met very favorably. The Company has already been approved to become a Vendor with most all the major retailers and in the first quarter of 2015 has begun shipping product and generating revenue. This should continue throughout 2015 and beyond.

Our patented fitness product was invented by a renown medical doctor who developed the product as physical therapy after undergoing back surgery and feeling he could develop a better protocol for recovery. He did. Many elements of a thirty minute infomercial have already been shot and the show should be completed before mid-year and marketing begin shortly thereafter.

The hair straightening product, which is a natural product that does not contain formaldehyde, can be applied at home and should keep hair straight two to three months on average. This will be a thirty minute infomercial some of which has already been shot. The Company looks to market this product the second half of 2015.

Results of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2014 compared to the year ended December 31, 2013

The following information should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. We also urge you to review and consider our disclosures describing various risks that may affect our business, which are set forth under the heading "Risk Factors".

For the year ended December 31, 2014 the Company recognized $49,077 of revenue. Cost of goods sold was $15,545 resulting in a gross margin of $33,532 compared to a gross deficit of $45,697 for the prior year. During the year ended December 31, 2013 the Company recorded revenues of $23,740. Cost of goods sold was $69,437, which included $60,316 of impairment expense for the write down of inventory. The Company determined that it was in our best interest to no longer pursue the marketing and production of two of our initial products, The Kruncher and the Xsize sandal. As of December 31, 2013, the Company sold our remaining inventory of The Kruncher for $14,717 below cost. In addition, the Company impaired the remaining $34,140 of inventory of the Xsize sandal to cost of goods.

For the year ended December 31, 2014, compensation expense decreased $13,469 to $220,844 for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to $234,313 for the year ended December 31, 2013. The decrease is due to the officers agreeing to lower their compensation in 2014.

For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company incurred $152,831 in advertising and promotional expense as compared to $261,661 for the prior year, a decrease of $108,830, or 41.5%. The decrease is a function of the timing of promotional activities for the Company’s many new products.

For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company incurred $89,528 in professional fees compared to $366,467 in the prior year, a decrease of $276,939 or 75.5%. In the prior year the Company incurred additional expense related to filing a post-effective amendment to our Registration Statement on Form S-1, as well as stock issued for legal services in the amount of $250,000.

For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company incurred $857,795 in general and administrative expense as compared to $532,761 for the prior year, an increase of $325,034, or 61%. In the current year the Company issued stock for services to Namfrod Enterprises for non-cash expense of $389,066, reducing general and administrative expense to $468,729.

For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company had $436,811 in other expense compared to $76,913 of other income in the prior year. For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recognized a gain on the extinguishment of debt of $121,238 whereas in the current there was a loss on conversion of debt of $424,119.

For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company recorded a net loss of $1,724,277 as compared to a net loss of $1,363,986 in the prior year, a $360,291, or 26.4% increase in net loss. The increase can be mainly attributed to stock issued for services and the loss on conversion of debt.

During 2013 and 2014 the Company relied upon financing to fund operations. As of December 31, 2014, the Company believes that it will generate sufficient capital to satisfy working capital requirements for the next 12 months. We project that the Company will need approximately $1,000,000 in “additional working capital” to meet short term liquidity requirements. By the end of the first quarter 2015, we had purchase orders with seven major retail outlets in excess of $1.7 million with an expected gross margin of approximately $935,000. These sales are in addition to our direct response campaigns and website sales.

On February 20, 2015, the Company executed a Factoring and Security Agreement with LSQ Funding Group L.C. (“LSQ”) Pursuant to the terms of the agreement LSQ will purchase as absolute owner certain accounts receivable as agreed upon by both parties. LSQ will credit the Company’s account for the purchase price less applicable fees. As of March 31, 2015 LSQ has purchased $814,512 of the Company’s receivables. Of this the Company has received approximately $715,800.

In addition to the above revenue, as of December 31, 2014, the Company converted $1,153,650 of principal and interest to common stock reducing notes payable to only $7,442. Also, the officers forgave all of their outstanding accrued salary of $189,320.

Based on revenue already realized in the first quarter of 2015, revenue projections beyond the 2015 first quarter and the debt that was eliminated in 2014 management believes that it will generate sufficient capital over the next year to fund its operations.

On January 16, 2015, the Company executed a convertible promissory note for $69,000 with KBM Worldwide, Inc. The note bears interest at 8% per annum and is due on or before October 20, 2015. The note is convertible at a 42% discount any time during the period beginning 180 days following the date of the note.

On January 9, 2015, the Company received a $50,000 short term loan from a creditor. The terms of the loan have not yet been finalized.

The Company had an accumulated deficit of $6,417,382 at December 31, 2014 and had a net loss of $1,724,277. During the year ended December 31, 2014, net cash used by operating activities was $547,121 compared to $786,157 for the prior year. Net cash flow from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $598,873 compared to $779,553 for the prior year.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements describes the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements. Estimates are used for, but not limited to, contingencies and taxes. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. The following critical accounting policies are impacted significantly by judgments, assumptions, and estimates used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

We are subject to various loss contingencies arising in the ordinary course of business. We consider the likelihood of loss or impairment of an asset or the incurrence of a liability, as well as our ability to reasonably estimate the amount of loss in determining loss contingencies. An estimated loss contingency is accrued when management concludes that it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. We regularly evaluate current information available to us to determine whether such accruals should be adjusted.

We recognize deferred tax assets (future tax benefits) and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the book carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. The deferred tax assets and liabilities represent the expected future tax return consequences of those differences, which are expected to be either deductible or taxable when the assets and liabilities are recovered or settled. Future tax benefits have been fully offset by a 100% valuation allowance as management is unable to determine that it is more likely than not that this deferred tax asset will be realized.

We have not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources and would be considered material to investors.

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update “ASU” 2014-15 on “Presentation of Financial Statements Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40) – Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern”. Currently, there is no guidance in U.S. GAAP about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern or to provide related footnote disclosures. The amendments in this Update provide that guidance. In doing so, the amendments are intended to reduce diversity in the timing and content of footnote disclosures. The amendments require management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, the amendments (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The amendments in this Update are effective for public and nonpublic entities for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted.

The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect. These pronouncements did not have any material impact on the financial statements unless otherwise disclosed, and the Company does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013

Studio City, California

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Insynergy Products, Inc. as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Insynergy Products, Inc. as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Insynergy Products, Inc. (formerly Insynergy, Inc.) (the "Company") was incorporated in the State of Nevada on January 26, 2010 to engage in Direct Response marketing that has the ability to take a product from the drawing board to the consumer via sales through television and/or retail. Direct Response marketing is a booming $300 billion per year business that has evolved during the past two decades from an entrepreneurial industry to one that now encompasses the marketing efforts of a vast majority of Fortune 500 companies.

The Company’s financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Management further acknowledges that it is solely responsible for adopting sound accounting practices, establishing and maintaining a system of internal accounting control and preventing and detecting fraud. The Company's system of internal accounting control is designed to assure, among other items, that 1) recorded transactions are valid; 2) valid transactions are recorded; and 3) transactions are recorded in the proper period in a timely manner to produce financial statements which present fairly the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company for the respective periods being presented.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates include the estimated useful lives of property and equipment. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

We maintain our cash in bank deposit accounts, the balances of which at times may exceed federally insured limits. We continually monitor our banking relationships and consequently have not experienced any losses in our accounts. We believe we are not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash.

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. There were no cash equivalents for the year ended December 31, 2014 or 2013.

Revenues that have been recognized but not yet received are recorded as accounts receivable. Losses on receivables will be recognized when it is more likely than not that a receivable will not be collected. An allowance for estimated uncollectible amounts will be recognized to reduce the amount of receivables to its net realizable value. The allowance for uncollectible amounts is evaluated quarterly.

The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to

measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), and expandsdisclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:

Level 1: Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

Level 2: Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.

Level 3: Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

The carrying amount of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, prepaid expenses and accrued expenses approximate their fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments. The Company’s notes payable approximate the fair value of such instruments based upon management’s best estimate of interest rates that would be available to the Company for similar financial arrangements at December 31, 2014.

The Company does not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or a non-recurring basis.

Fixed assets are carried at the lower of cost or net realizable value. All fixed assets with a cost of $2,000 or greater are capitalized. Major betterments that extend the useful lives of assets are also capitalized. Normal maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. When assets are sold or otherwise disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is recognized in operations.

Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:

The Company follows paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company will recognize revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

The Company follows Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the fiscal year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the fiscal years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company adopted section 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 740-10-25”) with regards to uncertainty income taxes. Section 740-10-25 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under Section 740-10-25, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Section 740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. The Company had no material adjustments to its liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of Section 740-10-25.

We account for equity-based transactions with nonemployees under the provisions of ASC Topic No. 505-50, Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees (“ASC 505-50”). ASC 505-50 establishes that equity-based payment transactions with nonemployees shall be measured at the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The fair value of common stock issued for payments to nonemployees is measured at the market price on the date of grant. The fair value of equity instruments, other than common stock, is estimated using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. In general, we recognize the fair value of the equity instruments issued as deferred stock compensation and amortize the cost over the term of the contract.

We account for employee stock-based compensation in accordance with the guidance of FASB ASC Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation, which requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values. The fair value of the equity instrument is charged directly to compensation expense and credited to additional paid-in capital over the period during which services are rendered.

Net income (loss) per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during the period. The weighted average number of common shares outstanding and potentially outstanding common shares assumes that the Company incorporated as of the beginning of the first period presented.

The Company’s diluted loss per share is the same as the basic loss per share for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, as the inclusion of any potential shares would have had an anti-dilutive effect due to the Company generating a loss.

The Company expenses the cost of advertising and promotional materials when incurred. For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 advertising costs were $152,831 and $261,661, respectively.

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year financial information to conform to the presentation used in the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014.

As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company has $144,893 and $25,730, respectively of finished goods inventory. Inventory is carried at the lower of cost or market.

During the year ended December 31, 2013 the Company determined that it was in its best interest to no longer pursue the marketing and production of two of its initial products, The Kruncher and the Xsize sandal. As of December 31, 2013, the Company sold the remaining inventory of The Kruncher for $14,717 below cost. In addition, the Company impaired the remaining $34,140 of inventory of the Xsize sandal to cost of goods.

Furniture fixtures and equipment, stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation at December 31 consisted of the following:

During the year ended December 31, 2013 the Company determined that it was in its best interest to no longer pursue the marketing and production the Xsize sandal. Consequently the molds and tools used for the manufacturing of this product are of no future use to the Company and were returned to the distributer. The write off of the assets resulted in a $35,259 loss on disposal.

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $41,786 and $33,928, respectively.

The Company has three non-collateral notes payable outstanding, that bear simple interest at 6% per annum. The first note is dated February 3, 2010 and is for $90,000. The second note is dated April 5, 2011 and is for $10,000. The third note is dated September 1, 2011 and is for $7,500. The notes principal and interest are due three years from the date of issuance. The Company also owed this individual $4,942 for expense reimbursement. The loan accrues interest at 6% and is due on demand. The interest expense has been recorded as additional paid in capital. On June 12, 2013, the first note payable for $90,000, plus $18,000 of accrued interest was forgiven by the note holder. As a result the Company recorded a $108,000 gain on forgiveness of debt for the year ended December 31, 2013. On December 29, 2014, the Company converted the two remaining notes along with the $4,942 and $3,788 of accrued interest into 104,920 shares of common stock, satisfying all amounts due in full. The value of the shares was determined using the average price of the most recent stock sales for cash, resulting a loss on conversion of debt of $7,030.

During 2013 and 2014, a shareholder had advanced the Company a total of $100,000 for a short term loan. The loan accrues interest at 6% and is due on demand. On December 29, 2014, the Company converted the $100,000 into 400,000 shares of common stock. The value of the shares was determined using the average price of the most recent stock sales for cash, resulting a loss on conversion of debt of $21,171. $5,629 of accrued interest was credited to gain on forgiveness of the debt.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company executed multiple promissory notes with a creditor for total proceeds of $474,500. The loans are uncollateralized, bear interest at 3% and mature in six months. As of December 31, 2014, the Company converted all principal and interest into 2,680,158 shares of common stock. The value of the shares was determined using the average of the most recent stock sales for cash, resulting a loss on conversion of debt of $346,906.

During 2013 and 2014, the Company executed multiple promissory notes with creditor for total proceeds of $112,200. The loans are uncollateralized, bear interest at 6% and mature in six months. On December 29, 2014, the Company converted all principal and interest into 540,000 shares of common stock. The value of the shares of was determined using the average of the most recent stock sales for cash, resulting a loss on conversion of debt of $49,215.

The Company also has financing loans for its product liability and Director and Officer Insurance. As of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 the loans have a balance of $7,442 and $7,369, respectively, they bear interest at 5.99% and 6.7% and are due within one year.

The Company currently occupies office space at 4705 Laurel Canyon Boulevard in Studio City, California. The Company signed a three year, three month lease starting December 1, 2011. Current lease payments are $6,541. The lease required a deposit of $10,610 which was paid on November 1, 2011.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2013, management negotiated a settlement with the lease holder to satisfy all past due and future lease payments through June 30, 2013. The terms of the agreement allowed for the Company to issue the lease holder 100,980 shares of common stock at $0.50 per share. The issuance of the stock relieved the Company of all past due amounts and paid its rent through June 30, 2013, which resulted in a gain on extinguishment of debt of $7,930.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2013, management agreed to issue the lease holder 64,200 shares of common stock at $0.30 per share in order to pay for the lease payments from July 1, 2013 through September 30, 2013.

On March 15, 2015, the Company executed a new lease agreement to begin April 1, 2015. Lease payments will be $6,500 per month plus parking and CAM charges. The lease expires December 31, 2015 but can be renewed for a one year extension.

On July 9, 2014, the Board of Directors approved an investment arrangement with an individual. Per the terms of the agreement the investor has transferred $150,000 to the Company for which he is now entitled to the following. $1 per unit sold through all retail outlets including online and retail shopping shows until the investment is paid back in full. Once the original investment is recouped the investor shall then receive a 2% royalty in perpetuity on all future retail sales of the Spidercore product.

On or about June 7, 2013, two of the three officers of the Company agreed to forgive all of their accrued compensation. As a result the Company credited $539,000 to additional paid in capital. Additionally accrued compensation of $32,964 was forgiven by these officers as of June 30, 2013.

In April 2013, the Company issued 250,000 shares of common stock to an officer, for accrued stock compensation, as required per the terms of the officer’s employment agreement and the Board Resolution dated April 2, 2012. Fair market value for the shares was determined by taking the average share price for each cash-for-stock purchase in the applicable period of accrual. The price ranged from $0.34 to $0.50 for a total expense of $86,793.

On September 30, 2014, Sandford Lang, CEO and Marty Goldrod, CFO, agreed to forgive all of their accrued compensation. As a result the Company credited $149,970 to additional paid in capital.

During the fourth quarter of 2013 Sanford Lang, CEO advanced the Company $70,000, $37,500 of which was repaid as of December 31, 2013. The Company recognized $406 of interest expense on the loan. The expense was credited to additional paid in capital.

During 2014, Mr. Lang advanced the Company an additional $10,400 and was repaid $38,800 leaving a balance of $4,100 as of December 31, 2014. Interest expense in 2014 of $787 was credited to additional paid in capital.

On September 30, 2014, Sandford Lang, CEO and Marty Goldrod, CFO, agreed to forgive all of their accrued compensation. As a result the Company credited $149,970 to additional paid in capital.

On December 31, 2014, Sandford Lang, CEO and Marty Goldrod, CFO, agreed to forgive all of their accrued compensation. As a result the Company credited $39,350 to additional paid in capital.

On January 29, 2014, the Company authorized the issuance of 1,000,000 stock options to Full Service Marketing. The aggregate fair value of the options totaled $195,885 based on the Black Scholes Merton pricing model using the following estimates: exercise price of $0.27, 0.71% risk free rate, 125% volatility and expected life of the options of 3 years. The Company has booked the $195,885 to additional paid in capital and a deferred expense account, to be amortized over the term of the options. For the year ended December 31, 2014, $59,854 has been amortized to expense.

A summary of the status of the Company’s outstanding stock options and changes during the periods is presented below:


	Shares available to purchase with options		Weighted Average Price		Weighted Average Fair Value

Outstanding, December 31, 2013		-	$	-	$	-

Issued		1,000,000		0.27		0.20
Exercised		-		-		-
Forfeited		-		-		-
Expired		-		-		-
Outstanding, December 31, 2014		1,000,000	$	0.27	$	0.20

Exercisable, December 31, 2014		1,000,000	$	0.27	$	0.20

On September 10, 2014, the Company sold 135,140 shares of common stock to an investor for cash proceeds of $50,000.

On September 15, 2014, the Company sold 75,758 shares of common stock to an investor for cash proceeds of $25,000.

On June 16, 2014, the Company converted principal and interest due to a creditor totaling $181,359 into 850,000 shares of common stock. The shares were valued at $0.285 which was determined using the average of the most recent stock sales for cash.

On July 1, 2014, the Company issued 1,111,617 shares of common stock for services to Namfrod Enterprises. The shares were valued at $0.35 per share for a total non-cash expense of $389,066. Fair market value for the shares was determined by taking the average share price for each cash-for-stock purchase in the period. The compensation stock shall be non-dilutable for a period of twenty four (24) months following the end of the term of the agreement.

On August 29, 2014, the Company cancelled 380,000 shares of common stock, that had been issued in a prior period for services, for non-performance of the agreed upon services.

On October 15, 2014, the Company sold 10,000 shares of common stock to an investor for cash proceeds of $3,000.

On October 15, 2014, the Company issued 37,000 shares of common stock for services to iCore Health. The shares were valued at $0.32 per share for a total non-cash expense of $11,729, $9,255 of which was booked to prepaid expense for marketing services. Fair market value for the shares was determined by taking the average share price for each cash-for-stock purchase in the period.

On October 30, 2014, the Company sold 37,037 shares of common stock to an investor for cash proceeds of $10,000.

During the fourth quarter, the Company converted principal and interest due to creditor totaling $295,145 into 1,830,158 shares of common stock. The shares were valued at $0.317 which was determined using the average of the most recent stock sales for cash.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company converted principal and interest due to creditor totaling $121,165 into 540,000 shares of common stock. The shares were valued at $0.317 which was determined using the average of the most recent stock sales for cash.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company converted principal and interest due to creditor totaling $100,000 into 400,000 shares of common stock. The shares were valued at $0.317 which was determined using the average of the most recent stock sales for cash.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company converted principal and interest due to creditor totaling $26,230 into 104,920 shares of common stock. The shares were valued at $0.317 which was determined using the average of the most recent stock sales for cash.

Deferred taxes are provided on a liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.

The income tax provision differs from the amount of income tax determined by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate to pretax income from continuing operations for the period ended December 31, due to the following:

At December 31, 2014, the Company had net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $3,791,000 that may be offset against future taxable income from the year 2014 to 2033. No tax benefit has been reported in the December 31, 2014 financial statements since the potential tax benefit is offset by a valuation allowance of the same amount.

Due to the change in ownership provisions of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, net operating loss carry forwards for Federal Income tax reporting purposes are subject to annual limitations. Should a change in ownership occur net operating loss carry forwards may be limited as to use in future years.

As of December 31, 2014, the company believes that it will generate sufficient capital to satisfy working capital requirements for the next 12 months. We project that the Company will need approximately $1,000,000 in “additional working capital” to meet short term liquidity requirements. By the end of the first quarter 2015, we had purchase orders with seven major retail outlets in excess of $1.7 million with an expected gross margin of approximately $935,000. These sales are in addition to our direct response campaigns and website sales.

On February 20, 2015, the Company executed a Factoring and Security Agreement with LSQ Funding Group L.C. (“LSQ”) Pursuant to the terms of the agreement LSQ will purchase as absolute owner certain accounts receivable as agreed upon by both parties. LSQ will credit the company’s account the purchase price less applicable fees. As of March 31, 2015 LSQ has purchased $814,512 of the Company’s receivables. Of this the Company has received approximately $715,800.

In addition to the above revenue as of December 31, 2014, the Company converted $1,153,650 of principal and interest to common stock reducing notes payable to only $7,442. Also, the officers forgave all of their outstanding accrued salary of $189,320.

Management has evaluated subsequent events pursuant to the requirements of ASC Topic 855 and has determined that no material subsequent events exist other than noted below.

Subsequent to December 31, 2014, the Company executed multiple promissory notes with creditor totaling $298,000. As of March 20, 2015 all $298,000 was converted into 1,655,555 shares of common stock.

On January 9, 2015, the Company received a $50,000 short term loan from creditor. The terms of the loan have not yet been finalized.

On February 20, 2015, the Company executed a Factoring and Security Agreement with LSQ Funding Group L.C. (“LSQ”) Pursuant to the terms of the agreement LSQ will purchase as absolute owner certain accounts receivable as agreed upon by both parties. LSQ will credit the company’s account the purchase price less applicable fees. As of March 31, 2015 LSQ has purchased $814,512 of the Company’s receivables. Of this the Company has received approximately $715,800.

Subsequent to December 31, 2014, the Company authorized the issuance of 4,000 shares of common stock for services.

Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

There were no disagreements between the Company and our accountants related to accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, internal controls or auditing scope or procedures during the last two fiscal year.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer who also acts as our principal financial officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. The disclosure controls and procedures ensure that all information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is: (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rule and forms; and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2014, these disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.

Our management is responsible to establish and maintain adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our Chief Executive Officer is responsible to design or supervise a process that provides reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The policies and procedures include:

maintenance of records in reasonable detail to accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of assets,

reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors, and

reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the period December 31, 2014. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control – Integrated Framework. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the fiscal year December 31, 2014, our internal control over financial reporting were not effective at that reasonable assurance level. The following aspects of the Company were noted as potential material weaknesses:

Our management has determined that there were no changes made in the implementation of our internal controls over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2014.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting because as a smaller reporting company we are not subject to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

The following table sets forth the names and ages of our current directors and executive officers. Also the principal offices and positions with us held by each person and the date such person became our director, executive officer. Our executive officers are appointed by our Board of Directors. Our directors serve until the earlier occurrence of the election of his or her successor at the next meeting of stockholders, death, resignation or removal by the Board of Directors. There are no family relationships among our directors, executive officers, director nominees.

Sanford Lang is a co-founder of Insynergy and has served as its Chief Executive Officer and as Chairman of its Board of Directors from January 2010 when the Company was incorporated, to the present. From January 2007 to October 2009, Mr. Lang was President of Xstatic Corporation, a company involved in the development, marketing and sale of retail products designed to improve strength, balance and flexibility. Mr. Lang was responsible for planning and implementation of all marketing for products, including the scripting and shooting of video campaigns for the Products. Mr. Lang was previously for approximately 30 years an executive in the movie industry.

Martin Goldrod is a co-founder of Insynergy, and has served as its President and Chief Operating Officer, as well as on the Board of Directors, from January 2010 when the Company was incorporated, to the present. From January 2010 until March 2015 he served as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer. From January 2007 to October 2009, Mr. Goldrod was Vice President of Xstatic Corporation, a company involved in the development, marketing and sale of retail products designed to improve strength, balance and flexibility. Mr. Goldrod was responsible for accounting and budgeting for Xstatic Corporation. Mr. Goldrod has an Associate of Arts degree from City College of San Francisco along with a certificate in Financial Planning from UCLA Extension. For approximately 30 years Mr. Goldrod was an executive in the music industry.

Rachel Boulds was appointed as Chief Financial Officer of the Company on March 6, 2015. She has been a Certified Public Accountant since September 2005. Since July 2009 to the present she has been the independent owner-operator of a Utah Professional Limited Liability Company that provides accounting services to companies. Her firm provides contract Chief Financial Officer, controllership, financial reporting, audit consulting, bookkeeping, and business operation consulting services to various public and private companies. Typical services include preparation of period-end financial statements, footnotes and Management Discussion and Analysis in conformity with US GAAP and SEC reporting rules, as well as consultation on complex accounting matters and working closely with client staff, auditors and legal counsel to prepare, review and file periodic public financial information, including Forms 10-K and 10-Q.

Mark Spallucci was appointed as a Director to fill a vacancy on our Board of Directors on June 22, 2012, Mr. Spallucci has been for more than the last 10 years a partner in Paravista, a printing and promotional company involved in the printing and the development of promotional items for many Fortune 500 companies in the Pharmaceutical, Financial and Entertainment industries. For the last 5 years he has held the title of Managing Partner for Paravista. In this role he is responsible for directing the development of client focused solutions for new product launches, brand line extensions and custom overseas products.

None of our officer nor directors, promoters or control persons have been involved in the past ten years in any of the following:

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our directors, executive officers and persons who own more than ten percent of our common stock, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock. Officers, directors and ten-percent or greater beneficial owners are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file. Based upon a review of those forms and representations regarding the need for filing for the year ended December 31, 2014, we believe all forms were timely filed.

We do not have a standing nominating committee for directors, nor do we have an audit committee with an audit committee financial expert serving on that committee. Our entire board of directors, including Messrs. Sanford, Goldrod and Spallucci, act as our nominating and audit committee.

The following table provides information as to cash compensation of all executive officers of the Company, for each of the Company’s last two fiscal years.

Name and principal position

Year

Salary

Bonus

All Other Compensation

Total

Sanford Lang

CEO

2014

2013

$7,762

$58,585

Martin Goldrod, President, COO & CFO

2014

2013

$4,650

$29,241

Rachel Boulds, CFO

2014

2013

N/A

N/A N/A

Phillip Miller, former VP of Production

2014

2013

N/A

$86,793

N/A

We have separate employment agreements with our three principle officers as follows:

The Company has entered into a five year employment contract with Sanford (Sandy) Lang, providing for his services as Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The employment Agreement provides for a salary of $120,000 per year, and for additional bonus compensation each year at the discretion of the Board of Directors. It also provides for a car allowance of $900 per month, reimbursement for all business expenses, and for participation in all employee benefit programs offered to other employees from time to time to other employees of the Company.

The Company has entered into a five year employment contract with Martin (Marty) Goldrod, providing for his services as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company. The employment Agreement provides for a salary of $60,000 per year, and for additional bonus compensation each year at the discretion of the Board of Directors. It also provides for reimbursement for all business expenses, and for participation in all employee benefit programs offered to other employees from time to time to other employees of the Company.

The Company appointed Rachel Boulds as its CFO on March 6, 2015. The Company and Ms. Boulds have not entered into any written compensation agreement for the position of Chief Financial Officer of the Company as of the date of this report.

The following table provides information concerning the compensation of the directors of the Company for the past fiscal year:

There are no outstanding equity awards or options to directors issued or outstanding.

Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table lists the securities authorized for issuance under any equity compensation plans approved by our shareholders and any equity compensation plans not approved by our shareholders as of December 31, 2014. This chart includes individual compensation arrangements as described below.

On January 29, 2014, the Company entered into an individual compensation agreement with Full Service Marketing. The Company authorized the issuance of 1,000,000 stock options to Full Service Marketing for marketing and other related services. The options have an exercise price of $0.27, are exercisable immediately and expire January 29, 2017.

The following table lists the beneficial ownership of our outstanding common stock by our management and each person or group known to us to own beneficially more than 5% of our voting common stock. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Based on these rules, two or more persons may be deemed to be the beneficial owners of the same securities. Except as indicated by footnote, the persons named in the table below have sole voting power and investment power with respect to the shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by them. The percentage of beneficial ownership is based on 26,234,368 shares of common stock outstanding as of April 3, 2015.


Title of Class	Name of Beneficial Owner	Amount of Beneficial Ownership	Percent of Class
Common Stock	Sanford Lang	8,050,320 (1)	30.7%
Common Stock	Martin Goldrod	1,442,500	5.5%
Common Stock	Rachel Boulds	0	0
Common Stock	Mark Spallucci	275,000	1.0%
	Directors and executive officers as a group (4 persons)	9,767,820	37.2%

Represents 7,540,320 shares by Mr. Lang, 500,000 shares held by his spouse and 10,000 shares held by a child living with him.

Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The following information summarizes transactions we have either engaged in for the past two fiscal years or propose to engage in, involving our executive officers, directors, more than 5% stockholders, or immediate family members of these persons. These transactions were negotiated between related parties without “arm’s length” bargaining and, as a result, the terms of these transactions may be different than transactions negotiated between unrelated persons.

Occasionally, officers will loan money at 6% interest rate to the Company to support working capital. During the fourth quarter of 2013 Sanford Lang, CEO advanced the Company $70,000, $37,500 of which was repaid as of December 31, 2013. During 2014, Mr. Lang advanced the Company an additional $10,400 and was repaid $38,800 leaving a balance of $4,100 as of December 31, 2014. For the period end December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 the Company recognized $787 and $406, respectively, of interest expense on the loan. The expense was recorded as additional paid in capital.

On September 30, 2014, Sandford Lang, CEO and Marty Goldrod, CFO, agreed to forgive all of their accrued compensation. As a result the Company credited $149,970 to additional paid in capital.

On December 31, 2014, Sandford Lang, CEO and Marty Goldrod, CFO, agreed to forgive all of their accrued compensation. As a result the Company credited $39,350 to additional paid in capital.

During 2013 and 2014, Rachel Boulds, our new Chief Financial Officer, provided accounting services to the Company. Her firm provided contract Chief Financial Officer, controllership, financial reporting, audit consulting, bookkeeping, and business operation consulting services to various public and private companies. Her firm also prepared the Company’s period-end financial statements, footnotes and Management Discussion and Analysis in conformity with US GAAP and SEC reporting rules, as well as consultation on complex accounting matters. For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2014 her firm billed the Company $6,500 and $6,500, respectively, per the terms of their agreement.

We believe Mark Spallucci is an independent director as defined under NASDAQ Stock Market Rule 5605(a) (2). This rule defines persons as “independent” who are neither officers nor employees of the company and have no relationships that, in the opinion of the board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out their responsibilities as directors. A Director is considered independent if the Board affirmatively determines that the Director (or an immediate family member) does not have any direct or indirect material relationship with the Company or its affiliates or any member of senior management of the Company or his or her affiliates. The term “affiliate” means any corporation or other entity that controls, is controlled by, or under common control with the Company, evidenced by the power to elect a majority of the Board of Directors or comparable governing body of such entity. The term “immediate family member” means spouse, parents, children, siblings, mothers- and fathers-in-law, sons- and daughters-in law, brothers- and sisters-in-laws and anyone (other than domestic employees) sharing the Director’s home.

At this time the Company does not have a policy that its directors or a majority be independent of management. The Company has at this time only three directors. It is the intention of the Company to implement a policy in the future that a majority of the Board member be independent of the Company’s management as the members of the board of director’s increases after implementation of the Company’s business plan.

The following table presents the aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years by our accounting firm, HJ Associates & Consultants, LLP, in connection with the audit of our financial statements and other professional services rendered by those accounting firms.

Audit fees represent fees for professional services rendered by our principal accountants for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of the financial statements included in our Forms 10-Q or services that are normally provided by our principal accountants in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

Audit-related fees represent professional services rendered for assurance and related services by the accounting firm that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements that are not reported under audit fees.

Tax fees represent professional services rendered by the accounting firm for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning.

All other fees represent fees billed for products and services provided by the accounting firm, other than the services reported for the other three categories.

Our audit committee makes recommendations to our board of directors regarding the engagement of an auditor. Our board of directors approves the engagement of the auditor before the firm renders audit and non-audit services. Our audit committee does not rely on pre-approval policies and procedures.

The audited financial statements of Insynergy Products, Inc., are included in this report under Item 8 on pages 16 to 30.

All financial statement schedules are included in the footnotes to the financial statements or are inapplicable or not required.

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.



Nevada		27-1781753
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

4705 Laurel Canyon Blvd., Suite 205, Studio City, CA (Address of principal executive offices)		91607 (Zip Code)


Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2014
Quarter Ended	High $	Low $
March 31, 2014	$1.20	$0.50
June 30, 2014	$1.00	$0.51
September 30, 2014	$3.00	$1.00
December 31, 2014	$3.50	$3.00

Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2013
Quarter Ended	High $	Low $
March 31, 2013	$1.50	$1.01
June 30, 2013	$2.90	$1.00
September 30, 2013	$2.95	$2.00
December 31, 2013	$2.05	$0.99


INSYNERGY PRODUCTS, INC. BALANCE SHEETS

		December 31, 2014		December 31, 2013
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash	$	196	$	8,398
Accounts receivable		7,016		-
Inventory		144,893		25,730
Employee expense advance		4,641		-
Prepaid consulting		65,295		-
Prepaid and other assets		74,179		71,362
Total Current Assets		296,220		105,490

Deposit		10,610		10,610
Deferred stock option compensation		70,736		-
Property and equipment, net		90,765		72,596
Total Assets	$	468,331	$	188,696

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	145,483	$	122,863
Other payables and accruals		167,598		10,593
Accrued compensation		76,260		92,332
Due to an officer		4,100		32,500
Notes payable		7,442		177,311
Accrued interest		-		6,964
Total Current Liabilities		400,883		442,563
Total Liabilities		400,883		442,563
Stockholders' Equity (Deficit):
Common Stock par value $0.001 300,000,000 shares authorized, 24,574,813 and 19,760,683 shares issued, respectively		24,576		19,762
Additional paid in capital		6,460,254		4,419,476
Retained deficit		(6,417,382)		(4,693,105)
Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)		67,448		(253,867)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)	$	468,331	$	188,696

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


INSYNERGY PRODUCTS, INC. STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

		For the Years Ended December 31,
		2014		2013
Revenues	$	49,077	$	23,740
Costs of goods sold		15,545		69,437
Gross margin (deficit)		33,532		(45,697)

Operating Expenses:
Compensation expense		220,844		234,313
Advertising and promotion		152,831		261,661
Professional fees		89,528		366,467
General and administrative		857,795		532,761
Total operating expenses		1,320,998		1, 395,202

Loss from operations		(1,287,466)		(1,440,899)

Other Income (Expense):
Interest expense		(18,493)		(11,666)
Loss on disposal of assets		-		(35,259)
Loss on conversion of debt		(424,119)		-
Other income		-		2,600
Gain on extinguishment of debt		5,801		121,238
Total other income (expense)		(436,811)		76,913

Net Loss	$	(1,724,277)	$	(1,363,986)

Loss per Share, Basic & Diluted	$	(0.08)	$	(0.08)
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding		21,218,500		17,930,498
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


INSYNERGY PRODUCTS, INC. STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIT)
	Common Stock				Additional
	Shares		Amount		Paid in Capital		Accumulated Deficit		Total
Balance, December 31, 2012	16,526,726	$	16,528	$	2,802,597	$	(3,329,119)	$	(509,994)
Stock issued for cash	2,183,777		2,184		600,816		-		603,000
Stock issued for services & accrued rent	800,180		800		356,801		-		357,601
Stock issued for accrued compensation	250,000		250		86,543		-		86,793
Forgiveness of related party debt	-		-		539,000		-		539,000
Contributed services	-		-		32,964		-		32,964
Contributed interest	-		-		755		-		755
Net Loss for the year ended December 31, 2013	-		-		-		(1,363,986)		(1,363,986)
Balance, December 31, 2013	19,760,683		19,762		4,419,476		(4,693,105)		(253,867)
Stock issued for cash	257,935		258		87,742		-		88,000
Stock issued for services	1,211,117		1,211		415,896		-		417,107
Stock issued for conversion of debt	3,725,078		3,725		1,149,926		-		1,153,651
Stock cancellation	(380,000)		(380)		380		-		-
Forgiveness of accrued officer compensation	-		-		189,320		-		189,320
Issuance of warrants	-		-		195,885		-		195,885
Contributed interest	-		-		1,629		-		1,629
Net Loss for the year ended December 31, 2014	-		-		-		(1,724,277)		(1,724,277)
Balance, December 31, 2014	24,574,813	$	24,576	$	6,460,254	$	(6,417,382)	$	(67,448)


[X]	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


[ ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


		December 31, 2014		December 31, 2013
Furniture Fixtures & Equipment	$	164,120	$	104,165
Leasehold improvements		12,230		12,230
Less: accumulated depreciation		(85,585)		(43,799)
Fixed assets, net	$	90,765	$	72,596


Range of Exercise Prices	Number Outstanding at 12/31/14	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life		Weighted Average Exercise Price
$0.27	1,000,000	2.1 years	$	0.20


		2014		2013
Deferred Tax Assets:
NOL Carryover	$	1,478,500	$	964,700
Related party accrual		1,600		-
Depreciation		(4,800)		2,600
Payroll accrual		32,700		40,100
Deferred tax liabilities:
Less valuation allowance		(1,508,000)		(1,007,400)


		2014		2013
Book Income (loss)	$	(672,500)	$	(532,000)
Meals and entertainment		1,400		4,900
Depreciation		(7,400)		1,800
Other nondeductible expenses		182,900		34,500
Related party accruals		(11,100)		(2,100)
Accrued payroll		(7,400)		(173,200)
Valuation allowance		514,100		666,100
	$	-	$	-


Name	Age	Position
Sanford Lang	69	Chief Executive Officer, Director & Chairman
Martin Goldrod	73	Director, President, & COO
Rachel Boulds	45	Chief Financial Officer
Mark Spallucci	45	Director


(1)	Any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;
(2)	Any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);
(3)	Being subject to any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, or any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; or
(4)	Being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated.


Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash	Stock Awards	All Other Compensation	Total
Sanford Lang	$0	$0	$0	$0
Martin Goldrod	$0	$0	$0	$0
Mark Spallucci	$0	$0	$0	$0


EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
Plan category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a)	Weighted-average exercisen price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b)	Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans(excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders	0	$ 0.00	0
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders	1,000,000	$ 0.27	0
Total	1,000,000	$ 0.27	0


10.3*	Executive Compensation Agreement between Martin Goldrod and Insynergy Products Inc., dated February 2, 2010 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.7 Form S-1, file No. 333-179262, filed January 31, 2012)
31.1	Chief Executive Officer Certification
31.2	Chief Financial Officer Certification
32.1	Section 1350 Certification
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document


	2014	2013
Audit fees	$ 39,100	$ 34,200
Audit-related fees	-	-
Tax fees	1,735	-
All other fees	$ -	$ 1,500


Exhibit No.	Description
3(i)	Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.0 Form S-1 file No. 333-179262, filed January 31, 2012)
3(ii)	Bylaws (incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.2 Form S-1 file No. 333-179262, filed January 31, 2012)
10.1	Studio City Plaza Title Holding Co. LLC and Insynergy lease agreement, dated March 11, 2015
10.2*	Executive Compensation Agreement between Sanford Lang and Insynergy Products Inc., dated February 2, 2010 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.6 Form S-1, file No. 333-179262, filed January 31, 2012)


Insynergy Products, Inc.

By:		/s/ Sanford Lang
		Sanford Lang
		Chief Executive Officer



Signature	Title	Date

/s/ Sanford Lang Sanford Lang	Chief Executive Officer, Co-Founder and Director	April 13, 2015

/s/Martin Goldrod Martin Goldrod	President, COO and Director	April 13, 2015

/s/Rachel Boulds Rachel Boulds	Chief Financial Officer	April 13, 2015

/s/ Mark Spallucci Mark Spallucci	Director	April 13, 2015