Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [ ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [ X ] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X]

The aggregate market value of the 16,779,048 shares of voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the closing price ($0.51) at which the common equity was last sold as of the last business day of its most recently completed second fiscal quarter (June 30, 2015) was approximately $8,557,314.

At April 11, 2016, there were 26,296,868 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.



PART I
		Page
Item 1.	Business	2

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	7

Item 2.	Property	7

Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	7

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	7

PART II

Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	7

Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	8

Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation	8

Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk	11

Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	12

Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	27

Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	27

Item 9B.	Other Information	28

PART III

Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	28

Item 11.	Executive Compensation	30

Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	31

Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	33

Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	34

Item 15.	Exhibits, and Financial Statement Schedules	35

	Signatures	36

Insynergy Products Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on January 26, 2010. The Company was organized to engage in Direct Response marketing that has the ability to take a product from the drawing board to the ultimate consumer via sales through television, Internet and retail. As disclosed herein, our business model has evolved to including marketing our products through retail channels utilizing other pull through market such as social, innovative in-store merchandising and targeted public relations.

Certain matters discussed herein are forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-K involve risks and uncertainties, including statements as to:

These forward-looking statements can generally be identified as such because the context of the statement will include words such as we “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “estimate” or words of similar meaning. Similarly, statements that describe our future plans, objectives or goals are also forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties which are described in close proximity to such statements and which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. Shareholders, potential investors and other readers are urged to consider these factors in evaluating the forward-looking statements and are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements included herein are only made as of the date of this Form 10-K, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update such forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.

Insynergy Products (“Insynergy”) is a company with deep experience in commercializing consumer products. Beyond developing products, a core competency is commercial and infomercial production development combined with specific expertise in traditional and digital media acquisition. The foundation of Insynergy and the continued corporate goal is to develop intellectual property (“IP”) internally or via a license from a third party. The path to monetization and value creation is realized as the Company then exploits our growing distribution footprint. Beyond the goal of extensive profitability, the intent is to engineer sustained and long term value by building the portfolio of IP inclusive of products and brands. The Board of Directors is cognizant of the Company’s stage, size, limitations, attributes short and long term goals. Ultimately the Company envisions a healthy organic growth path coupled by strategic acquisitions. This will lead the Company to an upgrade onto a primary securities exchange by 2018. Insynergy has a keen eye for strategic acquisitions and has identified certain takeover targets that the Company expects to start to capitalize on in 2017.

The Company’s commercialization path intently depends on identifying a novel product(s). Once found, a series of due diligence steps are taken ensuring the product’s success. From technology to marketing to feasibility, the product as a whole is intently examined. The Company consistently and with discipline follows a SWOT Analysis in understanding a product from a 360 vantage point that sets the stage for sound and low risk commercialization inferences. SWOT is the analysis of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. Everything from patent and trademark searches to liability analysis to broad retail shelf sweeps are undertaken until the Board of Directors approves a product as a candidate for launch. Then a series of intimate customer engagements begins. From focus groups to trial runs to engagement with corporate buyers for their privileged views, this all provides a level of insight that strategically positions Insynergy as a unique and formative player in the consumer products industry.

Insynergy today has established vendor numbers with key retailors across the nation, including Home Depot, Walgreens, Kroger, and Dollar General, to name a few, all due to our first product’s success Plumbers Hero – www.plumbershero.com.

This unique drain clearing aerosol product was launched in the first quarter of 2015 in an expedited fashion in order to accomplish a few key tactical goals being revenue growth, vendor number acquisition and brand development. Due to our CEO’s past experience, commercializing Plumbers Hero was a quick process. With a cumulative media spend over the first three quarters of approximately $500,000 not only was national retail distribution gained but total gross revenues topped $1.5M in under eight months. The project was designed as a short term run with a critical start and stop time line. This provided enough market inertia to not only generate sales and brand development but it positioned the Company to gain retail vendor numbers and shelf space. Due to the media and direct to consumer response the strategy to then pull the product through retail was a comprehensive success. The nature of this project was to commercialize, market and distribute via Direct Response TV and retail with the understanding the product will not have long term shelf stability as the goal was not to reinvest in media. A quick controlled investment with specific and measured goals. As this product had a relatively low cost to commercialize, the Company desired a big splash, easy consumer acceptance, DR sales, vendor numbers, shelf space and retail sales that now set the stage for our future, which includes a remarkable and broad portfolio of recently acquired IP.

In the third quarter of 2015, we struck a land mark license deal with Mr. Ross Sklar of The Starco Group. Insynergy secured the exclusive license to a broad body of novel products and technologies in the following categories:

The products in the aforementioned categories will fill our pipeline until 2025.

The significance of the license agreement is that it enables the Company access to cutting edge products that span multiple categories. This allows Insynergy the ability to focus on our core competencies in branding, media production/buying and distribution. With the ground work done in this first year Insynergy has opened retail channels with many of the major retail accounts and will commercialize unique IP while strategically marketing and placing our products into their distribution.

Mr. Sklar currently oversees a very broad manufacturing infrastructure that produces products in the aforementioned categories. This adds a portfolio of leading-edge IP that not only vertically integrates Insynergy’s research and development efforts but it completely builds out our product pipeline for years to come. It is our belief that no one in the space has our technological depth. While there are competitive players in Insynergy’s DRTV/retail vertical, the resources and depth Insynergy now has positions the Company to take a dominating role over the next five years.

In 2015 the Company had a busy and successful year. To top things off we secured and fulfilled a very large order from a big box leader, totaling over $350,000.

2015 has been a wonderful developmental year for Insynergy, while we have experienced some recent cash flow rigidity the Company is well structured with very low overhead. In the following months we will be announcing further strategic corporate joint ventures involving a shopping channel combined with cross category product launches and management is thrilled to execute on our strategic plan in 2016 and beyond.

Direct Response Marketing generally takes the form of the marketing and sale of products utilizing infomercials which are broadcast over local television channels, paired with a Call Response Center which takes the calls generated by potential purchasers who call in after viewing the infomercial, and a fulfillment center, which ships out the product.

The infomercial is designed to solicit a direct response in the target audience which is specific and quantifiable. The delivery of the response is directly between the viewer and the advertiser, that is, the customer responds to the marketer or its agent directly. In direct marketing (such as telemarketing), there is no intermediary broadcast media involved. In Direct “Response” Marketing, marketers use broadcast media to encourage customers to contact them directly. This direct response marketing seeks to elicit action. Marketing results from a Direct Response Marketing Program can be tracked, measured, and quantified.

Sufficient information for the consumer to make a decision whether to act and buy

Provision of a means for buy response (typically multiple options such as toll free number, web page, and email)

Direct Response Marketing is often used for new and innovative products that can be demonstrated and shown to make life easier or better, or products which solve a specific problem the target audience may have.

Health and fitness products, skin, hair and personal care products, nutritional supplements, house wares and appliances, have all been successfully marketed. Anti-aging products are a category of product which is currently generating successful sales. An idea for a new product usually comes from an inventor, who then approaches a company such as ours for development and implementation of a Direct Marketing Program or campaign for the product.

Our Company selects products invented by others for use in a Direct Response Marketing Program, but we also develop our own products for sale as well. We will analyze each product presented to us to see if it looks like it would be an attractive candidate for a direct marketing campaign. We will look for products which satisfy a specific need that can be concretely presented in the infomercial, lend themselves to generation of a call for action motivation in the target audience, provide for a substantial markup on the sales price over their cost (typically somewhere in the realm of a 5 to 1 markup), have a lower range target price in order to encourage immediate discretionary purchase, and have anticipated staying power as a useful product which the Company can sell over and over again.

We will license products from the inventor or owner of the product, with license fees paid on collected revenue from the sales of the product, net of returns and allowances. Typical license fees run between 2% and 4% of net sales for sales generated over television and the web, and if the Company is able to then take the product for distribution to traditional brick and mortar outlets for further sales, an increased license fee of between 4% and 6% is typically paid. The license rights typically run for between 24 and 36 months, and are generally renewable. Products may or may not have patent protection, copyright protection, and/or trademark protection.

The Company is developing products that will be marketed in many different areas. This will be a completely different type of branding. Social media will be a key factor to making consumers aware of new and great retail brands. This special type of advertising will bring consumers into the stores and create a special awareness of new and exciting products.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company centered its efforts on Plumber’s Hero, a product that clears normal clogs in the shower, tub, kitchen sink, bathroom sink and toilet.

Our exclusive License Agreement gives us worldwide rights to advertise, promote, market, manufacture, distribute, sell and/or exploit the product in any and all media, means and markets and all channels of trade and distribution now known or hereafter devised.

The Plumber’s Hero kit comes with a canister containing twenty applications of the Plumber’s Hero formula, one large and one small rubber drain cover to work on kitchen sinks, including double sinks with a disposal, bathroom, shower and tub drains, as well as an extension handle for use in the toilet.

Two minute, one minute and thirty second commercials were shot and the marketing campaign ran throughout 2015.

Demonstrating the appeal and uniqueness of the product in a sales video infomercial is critical in creating a buying response.

An offer must be presented in the video such that its appeal is relevant to the wants or needs of the audience.

Short form direct response video commercials have time lengths ranging from 30 seconds to 2 minutes. Long form infomercials are 30 minutes in length. Direct Response ads can be contrasted with normal television commercials because traditional commercials normally do not solicit a direct immediate response from the viewer, but instead try to brand their product in the market place.

The typical direct response spot of two minutes consists of a spokesperson or dominant voice over footage showing the product being demonstrated, solving a problem and/or making life easier and better. An 800 phone number will be shown on screen a few seconds into the spot along with a website address. The last few seconds of the spot will show a blue screen with all the information to make a purchase and provide a call to action.

The Company writes, produces, hires the talent, directs, shoots and edits many of its infomercials in-house. The Company will also hire outside production companies who have had success shooting shows with products in the same genre as the products we will be releasing such as fitness, house wares and hair care.

We test all our products with a retail sales group before we execute a license agreement, in order to gauge the likely reaction in the market place. Once a license agreement is executed, we will typically create the video, and then spend small amounts of money on media air time over test stations and test air segments that have what management considers the right demographics for a particular product. If a product successfully generates sales in these test spots, we will then expand the campaign for the product over additional TV markets. During the test marketing stage we also tweak the video infomercial as to dialogue, and as to order of presentment of material.

The products and demographics will dictate which TV market management selects for a particular campaign. We expect most of our spots to run approximately 2 minutes. The cost per spot will depend on which market it is show in, and at what time the spot airs. We may also use radio and/or direct mailing campaigns, and will provide a website over which a product can be purchased.

Once a customer has decided to buy our product, they either call an 800 phone number or go to a website to conclude the purchase. In today’s marketing climate, order taking for many products sold under $20 is done by an interactive voice recognition telephone application (“IVR”) which electronically takes the customer’s name and address, phone number, credit card information and orders for products. Order information will be in a file format to be batched and sent daily to a fulfillment facility.

Using the IVR application is perhaps half the cost of using live agents to respond to calls, but for some products with higher price points, live sales agents provided by independent third party contractors will be used.

The Company will subcontract out to independent third parties the telephone marketing functions associated with a campaign for each product. Initially, the Company has contracted for Teleperformance (“Teleperformance”) to provide this function, although many other companies are available to undertake this roll at competitive pricing, and the Company may use others in the future.

The Company will out-source the manufacture of products it markets to independent third party companies. The Company has had discussions with several mainland China manufacturers, for the manufacture of products. Unless presented with a Letter of Credit, a mainland China manufacturer generally requires 30% as down payment to begin manufacturing and the balance when the product is ready to ship. Management believes there are many sources for manufacturing in China, and elsewhere offshore, which are generally dependable and reasonably priced. However, the product, Plumber’s Hero, is 100% manufactured in the United States.

Fulfillment involves the storage of inventory, acceptance of order information, boxing and shipping out of products, and dealing with questions, order status, complaints, returns and allowances on products, and maintaining proper records. The fulfillment function on each product will be sub-contracted out to independent third party companies.

Initially, the Company has contracted for Moulton Logistics to provide this function, although many other companies are available to undertake this role at competitive prices, and the Company may use others in the future.

Sales orders for Direct Response Marketing Programs are typically taken using credit cards. The Company has contracted for credit card processing of sales orders on products with BluePay, an independent third party company. BluePay powers payment processing for companies that sell direct to consumers through internet retail, online services, direct response marketing and multichannel retail.

Some of our future Direct Response Marketing Campaigns will no doubt fail. Direct response products can fail due to many reasons, including no perceived need for the product, other competing products provide better solutions or are better priced, the product price is too high, the infomercial is unconvincing, the wrong time slot or market segment is selected for broadcast, the marketing company lacks sufficient capital to fund product inventory and air time purchase, and for a variety of other reasons. Larger trends, such as a recessionary economy, less discretionary purchasing power in the hands of consumers, more restrictive credit or higher rates on credit cards, also can discourage sales and cause a campaign to fail. Other issues can also cause a campaign to fail, such as too low a price markup, poor quality resulting in high returns, a lack of sufficient capital to purchase sufficient airtime, or to purchase sufficient inventory, or failure by third party contractors to properly carry out their responsibilities for manufacturer, order taking, and fulfillment.

Management will endeavor to avoid these pitfalls in selection of a product, production of the TV spot, test marketing, purchasing of air time, and other aspects of running of the campaign, but there are significant risks in conducting a direct response marketing business, and we will no doubt have some product failures which will result in loss, while other products may barely breakeven and return the costs laid out to undertake product production and the campaign.

If a product is financially successful in our direct marketing response campaign, management will consider marketing and distributing the product to big box retail stores, building off the product branding that has occurred by running the television campaign.

There is significant competition in the Direct Response Marketing industry from both small and large companies since there are really no barriers to entry. As a result, there are literally hundreds of direct response companies that operate in the U.S. and offer a wide variety of products across all categories of consumer goods.

The Company will have to rely on the skills of its management to pick products which produce successful direct response marketing campaigns and ultimately profits to the Company.

The Company carries general liability insurance through CNA with an occurrence limit of $1,000,000 with a general aggregate of $2,000,000 and a deductible of $500. The Company also carries product liability insurance to insure against liability on the products it sells.

The Company may file registrations for such patents, trademarks, or copyrights, as it deems commercially prudent from time to time.

Our infomercials may be subject to regulation by the FTC and each of the states under general consumer protection statutes prohibiting unfair or deceptive acts and practices. Most deception involves written or oral misrepresentations, or omissions of material information. Deception may also occur in other forms of conduct associated with a sales transaction.

The Company has two full-time employees, but will use independent contractors when we shoot our direct response marketing TV spots.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and, as such, are not required to provide the information under this Item.

Our principal offices are located at 2501 Burbank Blvd., Suite 201, Burbank, California, 91505. In December 2015 the Company entered into a three-year lease, starting January 1, 2016, with Burbank Properties, L.P. for 1,957 square feet of office space. Current lease payments are $3,425 with yearly increases during the term of the lease. The lease also provides an option to extend the lease for an additional three years upon expiration of the current lease term. The lease may be terminated with a 10-day written notice from the landlord for violation of the lease terms. The Company considers the space to be adequate for the next several years.

Item 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Our common stock is listed to trade on the OTC Markets Group OTCQB under the symbol “ISYG.” The following table presents the range of the high and low trading prices of our common stock for each quarter of the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 as reported by the OTC Markets. Bid and ask quotations are available when there are two or more market makers and those quotations represent prices between dealers and may not include retail markups, markdowns, or commissions and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

Our shares are subject to Section 15(g) and Rule 15g-9 of the Securities and Exchange Act, commonly referred to as the “penny stock” rule. The rule defines penny stock to be any equity security that has a market price less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. These rules may restrict the ability of broker-dealers to trade or maintain a market in our common stock and may affect the ability of shareholders to sell their shares. Broker-dealers who sell penny stocks to persons other than established customers and accredited investors must make a special suitability determination for the purchase of the security. Accredited investors, in general, include individuals with assets in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 together with their spouse, and certain institutional investors. The rules require the broker-dealer to receive the purchaser’s written consent to the transaction prior to the purchase and require the broker-dealer to deliver a risk disclosure document relating to the penny stock prior to the first transaction. A broker-dealer also must disclose the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, and current quotations for the security. Finally, monthly statements must be sent to customers disclosing recent price information for the penny stocks.

As of March 25, 2016, we had 166 shareholders of record, which does not include shareholders who hold shares in “street accounts” of securities brokers.

We have not paid cash or stock dividends and have no present plan to pay any dividends, intending instead to reinvest our earnings, if any. For the foreseeable future, we expect to retain any earnings to finance the operation and expansion of our business and the payment of any cash dividends on our common stock is unlikely.

The Company did not repurchase any of its securities during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.

The registrant is a smaller reporting company, pursuant to Rule 229.10(f)(1), and is not required to report this information.

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Results of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to the year ended December 31, 2014

The following information should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

For the year ended December 31, 2015 the Company recorded revenue, net of sales returns, of $2,069,285 compared to $49,077 for the year ended December 31, 2014. Cost of goods sold was $1,118,378 compared to $15,545 in the prior period. Revenue in the current year was offset by $165,138, resulting in net revenue for the year ended of $2,069,285. This offset was a reduction to our accounts receivable as a result of a mark down program for the Plumber’s Hero at two major retailers. We experienced a decrease in revenue in the latter part of the year largely due to amount and timing of sales to two of our retailers. Both vendors made large initial purchases in the first quarter providing them with enough inventory through the third and fourth quarters so that they have not yet had to order additional product. In addition, initial orders from new retailers have been more conservative as they introduce the Plumber’s Hero to their customers.

We introduced the Plumber’s Hero to the retail market with great success in the first quarter of 2015. In the second quarter we saw an increase in our cost of goods sold as a percentage of sales. A portion of this was the result of the cost and sale price for the Plumber’s Hero packaged specifically for one of our retail accounts. For this particular item the cost is approximately 10% more of the sale price than for other retailers. We also determined that it was in our best interest to no longer pursue the marketing and production of two of our products. The remaining inventory for these products has been donated to charity. As a result, we recognized impairment expense of $42,232.

For the year ended December 31, 2015, compensation expense increased $32,428 to $253,272 compared to $220,844 for the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase is due to increasing the yearly salary for two of our officers.

For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company incurred $584,061 in advertising and promotional expense as compared to $152,831 for the prior year, an increase of $431,230, or 282%. The increase is primarily due to spending on promotional activities for the Plumber’s Hero including infomercial production.

For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company incurred $103,871 in professional fees compared to $89,528 in the prior year, an increase of $14,343 or 16%. Professional fees are mainly for accounting, auditing and legal services associated with our quarterly filings as a public company.

For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company incurred $902,732 in general and administrative expense as compared to $857,795 for the prior year, an increase of $44,937, or 5%.

On August 13, 2015, the Company signed a binding Letter of Intent with a third party whereby the Company will acquire the license rights to a series of products. Per the terms of the Letter of Intent, and the Warrant Agreement dated September 15, 2015, the Company issued 35 million warrants to the third party to purchase common stock. The aggregate fair value of the warrants totaled $6,501,715 which has been recorded as licensing expense.

For the year ended December 31, 2015 we had total other expense of $257,241 compared to $436,811 for the year ended December 31, 2014. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded interest expense of $23,184, a loss on disposal of fixed assets of $17,034 and a loss on conversion of debt of $226,811. In addition, as a result of the convertible Promissory Note with KBM Worldwide, Inc. we recorded amortization of debt discount of $50,029, a gain on settlement of debt of $62,859, and a gain on derivative of $3,042. In the prior year we recognized a loss on the conversion of debt of $424,119.

For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded a net loss of $7,651,985 as compared to a net loss of $1,724,277 in the prior year, an increase of $5,927,708. The increase is the direct result of licensing expense incurred as discussed above.

As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has an accumulated deficit of $14,069,367 at December 31, 2015, had a net loss of $7,651,985 and net cash used in operating activities of $620,092 for year ended December 31, 2015. This raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

While we are attempting to increase operations and revenues, our cash position may not be significant enough to support the Company’s daily operations. Management intends to raise additional funds by way of debt and equity financing. We believe that the actions presently being taken to further implement our business plan and generate increased revenues provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern. At present we are working on the development of four new products followed closely by others. Through a Licensing Agreement we have multiple products available in the areas of personal care, household cleaning/laundry, hardware, automotive, pet care and foods. While we believe in the viability of our strategy to generate increased revenues and in our ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to further implement its business plan and generate increased revenues.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, net cash used by investing activities was $0 compared to $59,954 for the prior year. Investing activity in the prior year was for the purchase of fixed assets. No new fixed assets have been purchased in the current year.

Net cash flows from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2015 were $660,381 compared to $598,873 for the year ended December 31, 2014. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we received $776,199 from the issuance of notes payable to third parties.

Our net loss for the year ended December 31, 2015 was significantly increased as a result of non-cash expense transactions. Taking into account these non-cash transactions the reconciled net loss would be $740,035. The table below is not a GAAP presentation of the financial statements and is presented only to show the reconciled net loss.

On July 9, 2014, the Board of Directors approved an investment arrangement with a third party individual. Per the terms of the agreement the investor has transferred $150,000 to the Company for which he is now entitled to the following: $1 per unit sold through all retail outlets including online and retail shopping shows until the investment is paid back in full. Once the original investment is recouped the investor shall then receive a 2% royalty in perpetuity on all future retail sales of our patented fitness product. As of December 31, 2015, no units of the applicable product have been sold. The investment remains with the Company and is disclosed as an accrued liability on the balance sheet.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company received short term loans from three creditors for a total of $354,000. The loans are uncollateralized, non-interest bearing and are due on demand.

The Company also has financing loans for its product liability and Director and Officer Insurance. As of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 the loans have a balance of $16,671 and $7,442, respectively, they bear interest at 5.99% and 6.7% and are due within one year.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Note 1 to the Financial Statements describes the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of the Financial Statements. Estimates are used for, but not limited to, contingencies and taxes. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. The following critical accounting policies are impacted significantly by judgments, assumptions, and estimates used in the preparation of the Financial Statements.

We are subject to various loss contingencies arising in the ordinary course of business. We consider the likelihood of loss or impairment of an asset or the incurrence of a liability, as well as our ability to reasonably estimate the amount of loss in determining loss contingencies. An estimated loss contingency is accrued when management concludes that it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. We regularly evaluate current information available to us to determine whether such accruals should be adjusted.

We recognize deferred tax assets (future tax benefits) and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the book carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. The deferred tax assets and liabilities represent the expected future tax return consequences of those differences, which are expected to be either deductible or taxable when the assets and liabilities are recovered or settled. Future tax benefits have been fully offset by a 100% valuation allowance as management is unable to determine that it is more likely than not that this deferred tax asset will be realized.

We have not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources and would be considered material to investors.

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update “ASU” 2014-15 on “Presentation of Financial Statements Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40) – Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern”. Currently, there is no guidance in U.S. GAAP about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern or to provide related footnote disclosures. The amendments in this Update provide that guidance. In doing so, the amendments are intended to reduce diversity in the timing and content of footnote disclosures. The amendments require management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, the amendments (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The amendments in this Update are effective for public and nonpublic entities for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted.

The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect. These pronouncements did not have any material impact on the financial statements unless otherwise disclosed, and the Company does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014

To the Board of Directors
Insynergy Products, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Insynergy Products, Inc. as of December 31, 2015, and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Insynergy Products, Inc. as of December 31, 2015, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 13 to the financial statements, the Company has suffered losses from operations since inception and its current cash flow is not enough to meet current needs. This raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regards to this matter are also described in Note 13. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Studio City, California

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Insynergy Products, Inc. as of December 31, 2014, and the related statement of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Insynergy Products, Inc. as of December 31, 2014, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Insynergy Products, Inc. (formerly Insynergy, Inc.) (the "Company") was incorporated in the State of Nevada on January 26, 2010 to engage in Direct Response marketing that has the ability to take a product from the drawing board to the consumer via sales through television and/or retail.

The Company’s financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Management further acknowledges that it is solely responsible for adopting sound accounting practices, establishing and maintaining a system of internal accounting control and preventing and detecting fraud. The Company's system of internal accounting control is designed to assure, among other items, that 1) recorded transactions are valid; 2) valid transactions are recorded; and 3) transactions are recorded in the proper period in a timely manner to produce financial statements which present fairly the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company for the respective periods being presented.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates include the estimated useful lives of property and equipment. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

We maintain our cash in bank deposit accounts, the balances of which at times may exceed federally insured limits. We continually monitor our banking relationships and consequently have not experienced any losses in our accounts. We believe we are not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash.

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. There were no cash equivalents for the year ended December 31, 2015 or 2014.

Revenues that have been recognized but not yet received are recorded as accounts receivable. Losses on receivables will be recognized when it is more likely than not that a receivable will not be collected. An allowance for estimated uncollectible amounts will be recognized to reduce the amount of receivables to its net realizable value. The allowance for uncollectible amounts is evaluated quarterly.

The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:

Level 1: Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

Level 2: Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.

Level 3: Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

The carrying amount of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, prepaid expenses and accrued expenses approximate their fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments. The Company’s notes payable approximates the fair value of such instruments based upon management’s best estimate of interest rates that would be available to the Company for similar financial arrangements at December 31, 2015.

The Company does not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or a non-recurring basis as of December 31, 2015 and 2014.

Fixed assets are carried at the lower of cost or net realizable value. All fixed assets with a cost of $2,000 or greater are capitalized. Major betterments that extend the useful lives of assets are also capitalized. Normal maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. When assets are sold or otherwise disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is recognized in operations.

Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of three years.

The Company follows paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company will recognize revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

The Company follows Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the fiscal year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the fiscal years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the Statements of Income in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company adopted section 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 740-10-25”) with regards to uncertainty income taxes. Section 740-10-25 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under Section 740-10-25, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Section 740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. The Company had no material adjustments to its liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of Section 740-10-25.

We account for equity-based transactions with nonemployees under the provisions of ASC Topic No. 505-50, Equity-Based

Payments to Non-Employees (“ASC 505-50”). ASC 505-50 establishes that equity-based payment transactions with nonemployees shall be measured at the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The fair value of common stock issued for payments to nonemployees is measured at the market price on the date of grant. The fair value of equity instruments, other than common stock, is estimated using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. In general, we recognize the fair value of the equity instruments issued as deferred stock compensation and amortize the cost over the term of the contract.

We account for employee stock-based compensation in accordance with the guidance of FASB ASC Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation, which requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values. The fair value of the equity instrument is charged directly to compensation expense and credited to additional paid-in capital over the period during which services are rendered.

Net income (loss) per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during the period. The weighted average number of common shares outstanding and potentially outstanding common shares assumes that the Company incorporated as of the beginning of the first period presented.

The Company’s diluted loss per share is the same as the basic loss per share for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, as the inclusion of any potential shares would have had an anti-dilutive effect due to the Company generating a loss.

The Company expenses the cost of advertising and promotional materials when incurred. For the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 advertising costs were $584,061 and $152,831, respectively.

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year financial information to conform to the presentation used in the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015.

As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company has $131,759 and $144,893, respectively of finished goods inventory. And $372,187 and $0 of work in process inventory, respectively. Inventory is carried at the lower of cost or market.

During the year ended December 31, 2015 the Company determined that it was in its best interest to no longer pursue the marketing and production of two of its initial products. As of December 31, 2015, the Company impaired the remaining $42,232 of inventory to cost of goods.

Furniture fixtures and equipment, stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation at December 31 consisted of the following:

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company ceased using the office space for which it had capitalized prior leasehold improvement expense of $12,230. Accordingly, the Company has determined that carrying amount of such asset is not recoverable and has written it down to $0, resulting in a loss on disposal of $7,148.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company determined that it would no longer be using tooling that had been capitalized at $26,500. Accordingly, the Company has determined that carrying amount of such asset is not recoverable and has written it down to $0, resulting in a loss on disposal of $9,886.

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 was $38,431 and $41,786, respectively.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company executed multiple promissory notes with a creditor for total proceeds of $298,000. The loans are uncollateralized, bear interest at 3% and mature in six months. As of December 31, 2015, the Company converted all principal and interest into 1,655,555 shares of common stock. The value of the shares was determined using the average of the most recent stock sales for cash, resulting in a loss on conversion of debt of $226,811.

On January 16, 2015, the Company executed a convertible promissory note for $69,000 with KBM Worldwide, Inc. The note bears interest at 8% per annum and is due on or before October 20, 2015. The note is convertible at a 42% discount any time during the period beginning 180 days following the date of the note. The Company recorded a debt discount in the amount of $50,029 in connection with the initial valuation of the beneficial conversion feature of the note to be amortized utilizing the interest method of accretion over the term of the note. Further, the Company recognized an initial derivative liability of $50,029 based on the Black Scholes Merton pricing model using the following inputs: stock price of $3.50, conversion price of $2.03, 0.75 years to maturity, 0.12% risk free rate, and volatility of 18.2%. On July 22, 2015, the Company repaid the $69,000 principal, and an additional $20,000 for all accrued interest and an early payment penalty. The remaining debt discount was expensed and the Company recognized a gain on derivative of $53,071 for the year ended December 31, 2015.

The Company currently occupies office space in Burbank, California. The Company signed a three-year lease starting January 1, 2016. Current lease payments are $3,425 with yearly increases. The lease required a deposit of $3,500 which was paid on December 10, 2015. Minimum lease payments over the next three years are as follows:

On July 9, 2014, the Board of Directors approved an investment arrangement with an individual. Per the terms of the agreement the investor has transferred $150,000 to the Company for which he is now entitled to the following. $1 per unit sold through all retail outlets including online and retail shopping shows until the investment is paid back in full. Once the original investment is recouped the investor shall then receive a 2% royalty in perpetuity on all future retail sales of the fitness product. As of December 31, 2015, no units of the applicable product have been sold. The investment remains with the Company and is disclosed as an accrued liability on the balance sheet.

As of December 31, 2014, the Company owed Sanford Lang, CEO $4,100 for cash advances used to pay for general operating expenses. This amount was repaid in full during 2015. As of December 31, 2015, the Company owed Mr. Lang $1,853 for expense reimbursement.

On May 15, 2015, the Company issued 25,000 shares of common stock to Rachel Boulds, CFO for services rendered. The shares were valued at $0.317 per share for a total non-cash expense of $7,925. Fair market value for the shares was determined by taking the average share price for each cash-for-stock purchase in the prior period.

On August 13, 2015, the Company, granted 15,000,000 warrants to purchase shares of common stock to Sanford Lang, CEO. The warrants will vest at 5,000,000 for each $5 million in revenue realized by the Company over the next eighteen months. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.23 and a term of ten years. The performance condition must be met for the award to vest; therefore, compensation costs will be recognized when those performance measures are met.

On August 13, 2015, the Company, granted 1,000,000 warrants to purchase shares of common stock to Martin Goldrod, COO. The warrants will vest at 333,000 for each $5 million in revenue realized by the Company over the next eighteen months. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.23 and a term of ten years. The performance condition must be met for the award to vest; therefore, compensation costs will be recognized when those performance measures are met.

Pursuant to a binding Letter of Intent with Ross Sklar (“Sklar”), a related party, dated August 13, 2015, the Company granted warrants to purchase 35,000,000 shares of common stock to Sklar on September 15, 2015 for consideration of entering into the license agreement. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.23 and a term of ten years.

During 2015 an officer advanced the Company $5,000, $3,600 of which was repaid. The advance was used to pay for general operating expenses. The advance is uncollateralized, non-interest bearing and due on demand.

On January 29, 2014, the Company authorized the issuance of 1,000,000 stock options to Full Service Marketing. The aggregate fair value of the options totaled $195,885 based on the Black Scholes Merton pricing model using the following estimates: exercise price of $0.27, 0.71% risk free rate, 125% volatility and expected life of the options of three years. The Company has booked the $195,885 to additional paid in capital and a deferred expense account, to be amortized over the term of the options. On July 20, 2015 the term of the options was reduced to two years accelerating the amortization of the deferred expense. For the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, $119,707 and $59,854 has been amortized to expense, respectively.

A summary of the status of the Company’s outstanding stock options and changes during the periods is presented below:


	Shares available to purchase with options		Weighted Average Price		Weighted Average Fair Value

Outstanding, December 31, 2014		1,000,000	$	0.27	$	0.20
			$
Issued		-	$	-	$	-
Exercised		-	$	-	$	-
Forfeited		-	$	-	$	-
Expired		-	$	-	$	-
Outstanding, December 31, 2015		1,000,000	$	0.27	$	0.20

Exercisable, December 31, 2015		1,000,000	$	0.27	$	0.20

Pursuant to a binding Letter of Intent with Ross Sklar (“Sklar”), a related party, dated August 13, 2015, the Company granted warrants to purchase 35,000,000 shares of common stock to Sklar on September 15, 2015. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.23 and a term of ten years. The aggregate fair value of the warrants totaled $6,501,715 based on the Black Scholes Merton pricing model using the following estimates: exercise price of $0.23, 2.28% risk free rate, 65.24% volatility and expected life of the options of 10 years. Mr. Sklar was also appointed to the Board of Directors designating him a related party.

A summary of the status of the Company’s outstanding stock warrants and changes during the periods is presented below:


	Shares available to purchase with warrants		Weighted Average Price		Weighted Average Fair Value

Outstanding, December 31, 2014		-	$	-	$	-

Issued		51,000,000	$	0.23	$	0.186
Exercised		-	$	-	$	-
Forfeited		-	$	-	$	-
Expired		-	$	-	$	-
Outstanding, December 31, 2015		51,000,000	$	0.23	$	0.186

Exercisable, December 31, 2015		35,000,000	$	0.23	$	0.186

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company issued 41,500 shares of common stock for services to service providers. The shares were valued at $0.317 per share for a total non-cash expense of $13,156. Fair market value for the shares was determined by taking the average share price for each cash-for-stock purchase in the prior period.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company converted loans due to a creditor totaling $298,000 into 1,655,555 shares of common stock. The shares were valued at $0.317 which was determined using the average of the most recent stock sales for cash.

Deferred taxes are provided on a liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.

The income tax provision differs from the amount of income tax determined by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate to pretax income from continuing operations for the period ended December 31, due to the following:

At December 31, 2015, the Company had net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $2,919,000 that may be offset against future taxable income from the year 2016 to 2035. No tax benefit has been reported in the December 31, 2015 financial statements since the potential tax benefit is offset by a valuation allowance of the same amount.

Due to the change in ownership provisions of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, net operating loss carry forwards for Federal Income tax reporting purposes are subject to annual limitations. Should a change in ownership occur net operating loss carry forwards may be limited as to use in future years.

While the Company is attempting to increase operations and revenues, the Company’s cash position may not be significant enough to support the Company’s daily operations. Management intends to raise additional funds by way of debt and equity financing. Management believes that the actions presently being taken to further implement its business plan and generate increased revenues provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to generate increased revenues and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to further implement its business plan and generate increased revenues. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

Management has evaluated subsequent events pursuant to the requirements of ASC Topic 855, from the balance sheet date through the date the financial statement were issued, and has determined that no material subsequent events exist.

Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

As reported in our Form 8-K filed January 7, 2016, HJ & Associates & Consultants, LLP, resigned as our independent registered public accounting firm due to its combination with Haynie & Company, effective January 1, 2016. As a result, Haynie & Company became the Company's independent registered public accounting firm.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer who also acts as our principal financial officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. The disclosure controls and procedures ensure that all information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is: (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rule and forms; and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2015, these disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.

Our management is responsible to establish and maintain adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our Chief Executive Officer is responsible to design or supervise a process that provides reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The policies and procedures include:

maintenance of records in reasonable detail to accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of assets,

reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors, and

reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the period December 31, 2015. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control – Integrated Framework. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the fiscal year December 31, 2015, our internal control over financial reporting were not effective at that reasonable assurance level. The following aspects of the Company were noted as potential material weaknesses:

Our management has determined that there were no changes made in the implementation of our internal controls over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2015.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting because as a smaller reporting company we are not subject to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

The following table sets forth the names and ages of our current directors and executive officers. Also the principal offices and positions with us held by each person and the date such person became our director, executive officer. Our bylaws require at least four directors to serve until the earlier occurrence of the election of his or her successor at the next meeting of stockholders, death, resignation or removal by the Board of Directors. Our executive officers are appointed by our board of directors and serve at its discretion. There are no family relationships among our directors, executive officers, director nominees.

Sanford Lang is a co-founder of Insynergy and has served as its Chief Executive Officer and as Chairman of its Board of Directors from January 2010 when the Company was incorporated, to the present. From January 2007 to October 2009, Mr. Lang was President of Xstatic Corporation, a company involved in the development, marketing and sale of retail products designed to improve strength, balance and flexibility. Mr. Lang was responsible for planning and implementation of all marketing for products, including the scripting and shooting of video campaigns for the Products. Mr. Lang was previously for approximately 30 years an executive in the movie industry.

Martin Goldrod is a co-founder of Insynergy, and has served as its President and Chief Operating Officer, as well as on the Board of Directors, from January 2010 when the Company was incorporated, to the present. From January 2010 until March 2015 he served as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer. From January 2007 to October 2009, Mr. Goldrod was Vice President of Xstatic Corporation, a company involved in the development, marketing and sale of retail products designed to improve strength, balance and flexibility. Mr. Goldrod was responsible for accounting and budgeting for Xstatic Corporation. Mr. Goldrod has an Associate of Arts degree from City College of San Francisco along with a certificate in Financial Planning from UCLA Extension. For approximately 30 years Mr. Goldrod was an executive in the music industry.

Rachel Boulds was appointed as Chief Financial Officer of the Company on March 6, 2015. She has been a Certified Public Accountant since September 2005. Since July 2009 to the present she has been the independent owner-operator of a Utah Professional Limited Liability Company that provides accounting services to companies. Her firm provides contract Chief Financial Officer, controllership, financial reporting, audit consulting, bookkeeping, and business operation consulting services to various public and private companies. Typical services include preparation of period-end financial statements, footnotes and Management Discussion and Analysis in conformity with US GAAP and SEC reporting rules, as well as consultation on complex accounting matters and working closely with client staff, auditors and legal counsel to prepare, review and file periodic public financial information, including Forms 10-K and 10-Q.

Ross Sklar was appointed to fill a vacancy on our Board on August 13, 2015. Mr. Sklar is 40 years old and is the founder and current Chief Executive Officer of The Starco Group, located in Los Angeles, California. He started The Starco Group in January 2010. The Starco Group is a coating and adhesive aerosol producer and one of only two companies in the U.S. that produces aerosols and janitor and food service chemicals all under one roof . For over 15 years Mr. Sklar has developed technology in the chemical, coatings, oil and gas, construction and consumer markets. He holds a Bachelor’s degree in Political Science with a minor in Economics from the University of Manitoba.

None of our officer nor directors, promoters or control persons have been involved in the past ten years in any of the following:

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our directors, executive officers and persons who own more than ten percent of our common stock, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock. Officers, directors and ten-percent or greater beneficial owners are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file. Based upon a review of those forms and representations regarding the need for filing for the year ended December 31, 2015, we believe Sanford Lang filed late one Form 4 related to one transaction; Martin Goldrod filed late two Forms 4 each related to one transaction; Rachel Boulds filed late one Form 4 related to one transaction and Ross Sklar filed late one Form 3.

We do not have a standing nominating committee for directors, nor do we have an audit committee with an audit committee financial expert serving on that committee. Our entire board of directors, including Messrs. Sanford, Goldrod and Sklar, act as our nominating and audit committee.

The following table provides information as to cash compensation of all executive officers of the Company, for each of the Company’s last two fiscal years.

(1) Amounts indicated are cash payments. All officers also have accrued unpaid salary.

We have separate employment agreements with our three principle officers as follows:

On February 5, 2010, the Company entered into a five-year employment contract with Sanford Lang, providing for his services as Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The employment Agreement provides for a salary of $120,000 per year, and for additional bonus compensation each year at the discretion of the Board of Directors. It also provides for a car allowance of $900 per month, reimbursement for all business expenses, and for participation in all employee benefit programs offered to other employees from time to time to other employees of the Company. Effective July 1, 2015, the Board approved an increase of the yearly salary to $180,000.

On February 5, 2010. the Company entered into a five-year employment contract with Martin Goldrod, providing for his services as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company. The employment Agreement provides for a salary of $60,000 per year, and for additional bonus compensation each year at the discretion of the Board of Directors. It also provides for reimbursement for all business expenses, and for participation in all employee benefit programs offered to other employees from time to time to other employees of the Company. Effective July 1, 2015, the Board approved an increase of the yearly salary to $65,000.

The Company appointed Rachel Boulds as its CFO on March 6, 2015. The Company and Ms. Boulds have not entered into any formal written compensation agreement for the position of Chief Financial Officer of the Company.

The following table provides information concerning the compensation of the current and former directors of the Company for the past fiscal year:


Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash	Stock Awards	All Other Compensation	Total
Sanford Lang	$0	$0	$0	$0
Martin Goldrod	$0	$0	$0	$0
Ross Sklar	$0	$0	$0	$0
Spallucci (former)	$0	$0	$0	$0

Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table lists the securities authorized for issuance under any equity compensation plans approved by our shareholders and any equity compensation plans not approved by our shareholders as of December 31, 2015. This chart includes individual compensation arrangements as described below.

On January 29, 2014, the Company entered into an individual compensation agreement with Full Service Marketing. The Company authorized the issuance of 1,000,000 stock options to Full Service Marketing for marketing and other related services. The options have an exercise price of $0.27, are exercisable immediately and expire January 29, 2017.

On August 13, 2015, the Company granted 15,000,000 warrants to purchase shares of common stock to Sanford Lang, CEO. The warrants will vest at 5,000,000 for each $5 million in revenue realized by the Company over the next eighteen months. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.23 and a term of ten years. The warrants were issued in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

On August 13, 2015, the Company, granted 1,000,000 warrants to purchase shares of common stock to Martin Goldrod, COO. The warrants will vest at 333,000 for each $5 million in revenue realized by the Company over the next eighteen months. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.23 and a term of ten years. The warrants were issued in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

On September 15, 2015, the Company granted warrants to purchase 35,000,000 shares of common stock to Ross Sklar in consideration for licensing rights to a series of products. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.23 and a term of ten years. The warrants were issued in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

The following table lists the beneficial ownership of our outstanding common stock by our management and each person or group known to us to own beneficially more than 5% of our voting common stock. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Based on these rules, two or more persons may be deemed to be the beneficial owners of the same securities. Except as indicated by footnote, the persons named in the table below have sole voting power and investment power with respect to the shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by them. The percentage of beneficial ownership is based on 26,296,868 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 25, 2016, plus an aggregate of 35,000,000 shares which the following persons may acquire within 60 days by the exercise of rights, warrants and/or options.


Title of Class	Name of Beneficial Owner	Amount of Beneficial Ownership	Percent of Class
Common Stock	Sanford Lang	7,540,320 (1)	12.3%
Common Stock	Martin Goldrod	1,362,500	2.2%
Common Stock	Rachel Boulds	25,000	0%
Common Stock	Ross Sklar	35,000,000 (2)	57.1%
	Directors and executive officers as a group (4 persons)	43,927,820	71.7%

(1) Represents 7,540,320 shares by Mr. Lang, 500,000 shares held by his spouse and 10,000 shares held by a child living with him.

(2) Represents warrants to purchase 35,000,000 common shares exercisable within the next 60 days.

Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The following information summarizes transactions we have either engaged in for the past two fiscal years or propose to engage in, involving our executive officers, directors, more than 5% stockholders, or immediate family members of these persons. These transactions were negotiated between related parties without “arm’s length” bargaining and, as a result, the terms of these transactions may be different than transactions negotiated between unrelated persons.

As of December 31, 2014, the Company owed Sanford Lang, CEO, $4,100 for cash advances used to pay for general operating expenses. This amount was repaid in full during 2015. As of December 31, 2015, the Company owed Mr. Lang $1,853 for expense reimbursement.

On September 30, 2014, Sanford Lang, CEO and Martin Goldrod, CFO, agreed to forgive all of their accrued compensation. As a result the Company credited $149,970 to additional paid in capital.

On December 31, 2014, Sanford Lang, CEO and Martin Goldrod, CFO, agreed to forgive all of their accrued compensation. As a result the Company credited $39,350 to additional paid in capital.

During 2014, Rachel Boulds, our new Chief Financial Officer, provided accounting services to the Company. Her firm provided contract Chief Financial Officer, controllership, financial reporting, audit consulting, bookkeeping, and business operation consulting services to various public and private companies. Her firm also prepared the Company’s period-end financial statements, footnotes and Management Discussion and Analysis in conformity with US GAAP and SEC reporting rules, as well as consultation on complex accounting matters. For the year ended December 31, 2014 her firm billed the Company $6,500, per the terms of their agreement.

During 2015 Martin Goldrod, COO advanced the Company $5,000, $3,600 of which was repaid. The advance was used to pay for general operating expenses. The advance is uncollateralized, non-interest bearing and due on demand.

Pursuant to a binding Letter of Intent with Ross Sklar (“Sklar”), dated August 13, 2015, the Company granted warrants to purchase 35,000,000 shares of common stock Sklar on September 15, 2015. The warrants were granted in consideration for licensing rights to a series of products owned by The Starco Group. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.23 and a term of ten years. Pursuant to the Letter of Intent, the Company appointed Mr. Sklar as a member of its Board of Directors on August 13, 2015.

On February 5, 2010, the Company entered into a five-year employment contract with Sanford Lang, providing for his services as Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The employment Agreement provides for a salary of $120,000 per year. Effective July 1, 2015, the Board approved an increase of the yearly salary to $180,000.

On February 5, 2010, the Company entered into a five-year employment contract with Martin Goldrod, providing for his services as President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company. The employment Agreement provides for a salary of $60,000 per year. Effective July 1, 2015, the Board approved an increase of the yearly salary to $65,000.

At this time the Company does not have a policy that its directors or a majority be independent of management. The Company has at this time only three directors. It is the intention of the Company to implement a policy in the future that a majority of the Board member be independent of the Company’s management as the members of the board of director’s increases after implementation of the Company’s business plan.

The following table presents the aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years by our accounting firms, Haynie & Company and HJ Associates & Consultants, LLP, in connection with the audit of our financial statements and other professional services rendered by those accounting firms.


		Haynie & Company 2015		HJ & Assoc. 2014
Audit fees	$	52,000	$	32,700
Audit-related fees	$	-	$	-
Tax fees	$	2,400	$	2,163
All other fees	$	-	$	-

Audit fees represent fees for professional services rendered by our principal accountants for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of the financial statements included in our Forms 10-Q or services that are normally provided by our principal accountants in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

Audit-related fees represent professional services rendered for assurance and related services by the accounting firm that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements that are not reported under audit fees.

Tax fees represent professional services rendered by the accounting firm for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning.

All other fees represent fees billed for products and services provided by the accounting firm, other than the services reported for the other three categories.

Our audit committee makes recommendations to our board of directors regarding the engagement of an auditor. Our board of directors approves the engagement of the auditor before the firm renders audit and non-audit services. Our audit committee does not rely on pre-approval policies and procedures.

The audited financial statements of Insynergy Products, Inc., are included in this report under Item 8 on pages 16 to 30.

All financial statement schedules are included in the footnotes to the financial statements or are inapplicable or not required.

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.



Nevada		27-1781753
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

2501 West Burbank Blvd., Suite 201, Burbank, CA (Address of principal executive offices)		91505 (Zip Code)


Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2015
Quarter Ended	High $	Low $
March 31, 2015	$3.25	$3.25
June 30, 2015	$0.75	$0.51
September 30, 2015	$0.18	$0.18
December 31, 2015	$0.25	$0.25

Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2014
Quarter Ended	High $	Low $
March 31, 2014	$1.20	$0.50


June 30, 2014	$1.00	$0.51
September 30, 2014	$3.00	$1.00
December 31, 2014	$3.50	$3.00


Net loss	$	(7,651,985)
Deduct non-cash gains:
Gain on extinguishment of debt		(62,859)
Add back non-cash expenses:
Shares issued for services		21,082
Depreciation		38,431
Deferred compensation		119,707
License fees paid with warrants		6,501,715
Loss on conversion of debt		226,811
Amortization of debt discount		50,029
Loss on disposal of fixed assets		17,034
Total		6,911,950
Reconciled net loss, reconciled for non-cash items	$	(740,035)
Reconciled net loss per share, reconciled for non-cash items	$	(0.03)


INSYNERGY PRODUCTS, INC. BALANCE SHEETS

		December 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash	$	40,485	$	196
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $5,855 and $0, respectively		172,143		7,016
Inventory		503,946		144,893
Employee expense advance		-		4,641
Prepaid consulting		16,324		65,295
Prepaid and other assets		67,748		74,179
Total Current Assets		800,646		296,220

Deposit		10,161		10,610
Deferred stock option compensation		-		70,736
Property and equipment, net		35,300		90,765
Total Assets	$	846,107	$	468,331

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	558,941	$	145,483
Other payables and accruals		223,615		167,598
Accrued compensation		226,556		76,260
Due to an officer		3,253		4,100
Notes payable		370,671		7,442
Total Current Liabilities		1,383,036		400,883
Total Liabilities		1,383,036		400,883
Stockholders' Equity (Deficit):
Common Stock par value $0.001 300,000,000 shares authorized, 26,296,868 and 24,574,813 shares issued, respectively		26,298		24,576
Additional paid in capital		13,506,140		6,460,254
Retained deficit		(14,069,367)		(6,417,382)
Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)		(536,929)		67,448
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)	$	846,107	$	468,331

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


[X]	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


[ ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


INSYNERGY PRODUCTS, INC. STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

		For the Years Ended December 31,
		2015		2014
Revenues	$	2,069,285	$	49,077
Costs of goods sold		1,118,378		15,545
Gross margin		950,907		33,532

Operating Expenses:
Compensation expense		253,272		220,844
Advertising and promotion		584,061		152,831
Professional fees		103,871		89,528
Licensing expense		6,501,715		-
General and administrative		902,732		857,795
Total operating expenses		8,345,651		1,320,998

Loss from operations		(7,394,744)		(1,287,466)

Other Income (Expense):
Interest expense		(23,184)		(18,493)
Amortization of debt discount		(50,029)		-
Loss on disposal of assets		(17,034)		-
Loss on conversion of debt		(226,811)		(424,119)
Change in fair value of derivative liability		(3,042)		-
Gain on extinguishment of debt		62,859		5,801
Total other expense		(257,241)		(436,811)

Net Loss	$	(7,651,985)	$	(1,724,277)

Loss per Share, Basic & Diluted	$	(0.29)	$	(0.08)
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding		26,094,042		21,218,500
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


INSYNERGY PRODUCTS, INC. STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIT)
	Common Stock				Additional
	Shares		Amount		Paid in Capital		Accumulated Deficit		Total
Balance, December 31, 2013	19,760,683	$	19,762	$	4,419,476	$	(4,693,105)	$	(253,867)
Stock issued for cash	257,935		258		87,742		-		88,000
Stock issued for services	1,211,117		1,211		415,896		-		417,107
Stock issued for conversion of debt	3,725,078		3,725		1,149,926		-		1,153,651
Stock cancellation	(380,000)		(380)		380		-		-
Forgiveness of accrued officer compensation	-		-		189,320		-		189,320
Issuance of warrants	-		-		195,885		-		195,885
Contributed interest	-		-		1,629		-		1,629
Net Loss for the year ended December 31, 2014	-		-		-		(1,724,277)		(1,724,277)
Balance, December 31, 2014	24,574,813		24,576		6,460,254		(6,417,382)		67,448
Stock issued for services	66,500		67		21,015		-		21,082
Stock issued for conversion of debt	1,655,555		1,655		523,156		-		524,811
Issuance of warrants	-		-		6,501,715		-		6,501,715
Net Loss for the year ended December 31, 2015	-		-		-		(7,651,985)		(7,651,985)
Balance, December 31, 2015	26,296,868	$	26,298	$	13,506,140	$	(14,069,367)	$	(536,929)


		December 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
Equipment	$	35,202	$	35,202
Furniture		37,276		37,276
Computers & Hardware		5,187		5,187
Leasehold improvements		-		12,230
Moldings		59,955		86,455
Less: accumulated depreciation		(102,320)		(85,585)
Fixed assets, net	$	35,300	$	90,765


Derivative liability at December 31, 2014	$	-
Derivative liability at inception		50,029
Elimination of liability on conversion		(53,071)
Change in fair value		3,042
Derivative liability at December 31, 2015	$	-


Range of Exercise Prices	Number Outstanding at 12/31/15	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life		Weighted Average Exercise Price
$0.27	1,000,000	1 month	$	0.20


Range of Exercise Prices	Number Outstanding 12/31/2015	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life		Weighted Average Exercise Price
$0.23	51,000,000	9.62 years	$	0.23


		2015		2014
Deferred Tax Assets:
NOL Carryover	$	1,138,500	$	1,478,500
Related party accrual		1,300		1,600
Allowance for doubtful accounts		2,300		-
Payroll accrual		88,400		32,700
Deferred tax liabilities:
Depreciation		3,600		(4,800)
Less valuation allowance		(1,234,100)		(1,508,000)
Net deferred tax assets	$	-	$	-


		2015		2014
Book loss	$	(3,278,100)	$	(672,500)
Meals and entertainment		4,600		1,400
Depreciation		11,300		(7,400)
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts		2,500		-
Other nondeductible expenses		2,921,400		182,900
Related party accruals		(400)		(11,100)
Accrued payroll		58,900		(7,400)
Valuation allowance		279,800		514,100
	$	-	$	-


Year		Amount
2016	$	41,097
2017		42,330
2018		43,596
Total	$	127,023


(1)	Any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;
(2)	Any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);
(3)	Being subject to any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, or any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; or
(4)	Being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated.


Exhibit No.	Description
3(i)	Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.0 Form S-1 file No. 333-179262, filed January 31, 2012)
3(ii)	By-laws of Insynergy Products, Inc., as amended August 13, 2015 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 3(ii) Form 8-K filed August 20, 2015
4.1	Warrant Agreement between Ross Sklar and Insynergy, dated September 15, 2015 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.3 Form 10-Q, filed November 23, 2015
10.1	Lease agreement between Burbank Commercial Properties, L.P. and Insynergy, dated December 9, 2015
10.2	Letter of Intent with Ross Sklar, dated August 13, 2015 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K, filed August 20, 2015)
31.1	Chief Executive Officer Certification
31.2	Chief Financial Officer Certification
32.1	Section 1350 Certification
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document


Name	Age	Position
Sanford Lang	70	Chief Executive Officer, Director & Chairman
Martin Goldrod	74	Director, President, & COO
Rachel Boulds	46	Chief Financial Officer
Ross Sklar	40	Director


EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
Plan category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a)	Weighted-average exerciseprice of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b)	Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders	0	$ 0.00	0
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders	52,000,000	$ 0.27	0
Total	52,000,000	$ 0.27	0


Insynergy Products, Inc.

By:		/s/ Sanford Lang
		Sanford Lang
		Chief Executive Officer



Signature	Title	Date

/s/ Sanford Lang Sanford Lang	Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and Director	April 14, 2016

/s/ Martin Goldrod Martin Goldrod	President, COO and Director	April 14, 2016
/s/ Rachel Boulds Rachel Boulds	Chief Financial Officer	April 14, 2016

/s/ Ross Sklar Ross Sklar	Director	April 14, 2016